A force acts on a particle based on position, determine work. Sign question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a force acting on a particle, where the force is defined as Fx = Cx^3. The main point of contention is the sign of the work done by the force as the particle moves from x = 3.0m to x = 1.5m. The original calculation yielded -9.5 Joules, while the solution manual suggested a positive work of 9.5 Joules due to a sign convention error regarding the direction of force and displacement. Clarification was provided that the integral's limits cause the work to be positive, aligning with the original calculation. The conclusion emphasizes that the solution manual's interpretation of the force's direction was incorrect, affirming the initial findings.
r0wbrt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a question about this problem in relation to the way the solution manual handles it.

Homework Statement



A force Fx acts on a particle of mass 1.5kg. The force is related to the position x of the particle by the formula Fx = Cx3, where C = .50. IF x is in maters and Fx is in Newtons. (a) What are the SI units of C? (b) Find the work done by this force as the particle moves from x = 3.0m to x = 1.5 m. (c) At x = 3.0m the force points in the opposite direction of the particles velocity (speed is 12m/s) What is its speed at x = 1.5m?

Ignore (a)

Homework Equations



W = \int F_{x} dx
W = \frac{1}{2}{mv}^{2}_{f} - \frac{1}{2}{mv}^{2}_{i}
Fx = Cx3


The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, when I solved the problem I used the first equation which gave me -9.5 Joules.

W = {\int}^{1.5m}_{3.0m} .5x^{3} dx = -9.5 Joules


However, when I referenced the solution manual, they placed a negative sign in front of Fx in the equation because the force is "in the opposite direction of the displacement."

W = {\int}^{1.5m}_{3.0m} -.5x^{3} dx = 9.5 Joules

This made no sense to me because the velocity of the particle is, from what I can tell, equal to -12m/s because the force function is always positive. So, it only makes sense to me that the force should be slowing the particle down since the particle is moving in the opposite direction of the force.

Consequently, because of the sign conversion, this throws off the answer to c as well because when I calculated the velocity with the negative work the velocity came out to 11.46m/s however, because the manual claims the work was positive, their result was 13m/s.

Derived Equation:
\sqrt{\frac{2W+m{v}^{2}_{i}}{m}} = v_f

I can not make sense of why the solution manual flipped the sign of the force function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution manual is wrong. You're right.

What the solution manual is trying to explain is that the force ##\vec{F}## and the displacement ##d\vec{x}## point in the opposite direction, so
$$dW=\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{x} = |\vec{F}||d\vec{x}|\cos 180^\circ = -|\vec{F}||d\vec{x}|$$What the person who wrote the solution missed was the fact that ##|d\vec{x}| = -dx## because the lower limit of the integral is greater than the upper limit, so the work is given by
$$W = -\int |\vec{F}||d\vec{x}| = +\int_{3.0\text{ m}}^{1.5\text{ m}} Cx^3\,dx$$ as you had.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top