Proof of Differentiability at a Point Implies Limit Exists

  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenPrivitera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that differentiability at a point implies the existence of a limit at that point, emphasizing the relationship between differentiability, continuity, and limits. The author aims to identify a specific delta for each epsilon to simplify limit proofs when a function is known to be differentiable. The mean value theorem is referenced as a relevant concept, illustrating how it relates to finding bounds on the difference between function values. The conversation highlights the importance of establishing a maximum value for the derivative over an interval to facilitate limit proofs. Overall, the proof seeks to clarify the connection between differentiability and limit existence in a rigorous mathematical context.
StephenPrivitera
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
What I tried to do with this proof is show that if a function is differentiable at a point, then the limit of the function at this point is the value of the function at that point. This seems like a pretty obvious point (since differentiability depends on continuity and continuity depends on the existence of the limit), so I tried to go a step further and identify a specific delta for each epsilon that would guarantee the existence of this limit. I was hopefully successful.
I spent about two hours working out the details (don't worry - it's not too long) and when I finally finished I was too exhausted to see if my proof stood up to a bunch of specific tests. Anyway, I was hoping someone more experience in math could check my proof. If it's wrong, show me where.
The purpose of this proof is to make finding deltas easy when I know that a function is differentiable. This is acceptable because finding delta is not a necessary part of a limit proof. If my first guess for delta work for all epsilons, then I have completed the proof.
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have you had the "mean value theorem" in calculus yet?

That looks to me like what you are trying to do.

The mean value theorem says that if f is continuous on some interval [a,b]and differentiable on (a,b) then there exist some point c in (a,b) such that (f(b)- f(a))/(b-a)= f'(c). From that,
f(b)- f(a)= f'(c)(b-a). In particular, if f' is continuous on (a,b) (which will always be true if f is also differentiable at a and b), then |f'(c)| has a maximum value on [a,b], say M, and we can say
|f(b)- f(a)|<= M|b-a|. Finally, given epsilon> 0, we can take
delta= epsilon/M.
 
Yes, I have studied the mean value theorem before (although not in the form you presented), but I was not thinking of this proof in that context. Does the mean value theorem allow you to find the value of M?
 
NO, there is no simple formula for M but it doesn't matter- it's a constant and so as x-> a M|x-a| goes to 0.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top