A girl coats down a hill on a sled

  • Thread starter Thread starter chenny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Girl Hill
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a sled travels on level ground before coming to a stop, given its initial speed of 7.0 m/s, a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.050, and a total weight of 645 N. Participants suggest starting with a free body diagram to identify forces acting on the sled, including friction and weight. Key equations mentioned include those for final velocity, acceleration, and frictional force. The conversation emphasizes breaking down the problem into components to simplify calculations. Ultimately, the goal is to determine how far the sled will slide before coming to rest.
chenny
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
reaching level ground at the bottom with a speed of 7.0 m/s. the coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled's runners and the hard, icy snow is 0.050, and the girl and sleed together weight 645 N. how far does the sled travel on the ground level before coming to rest?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chenny said:
reaching level ground at the bottom with a speed of 7.0 m/s. the coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled's runners and the hard, icy snow is 0.050, and the girl and sleed together weight 645 N. how far does the sled travel on the ground level before coming to rest?

What have you tried so far? Where are you running into difficulty?
 
i just took one look at the problem and my mind went blank. i totally do not know how to start it.
 
chenny said:
i just took one look at the problem and my mind went blank. i totally do not know how to start it.

Draw a free body diagram. What are the forces acting on the sled?

Remember to break everything up into x- and y-components.

v_{f}^{2}=v_{i}^{2}+2ad

v_{f}=v_{i}+at

x_{f}=x_{i}+v_{0}t+\frac{1}{2}at^{2}

F_{k}=\mu_{k}N

F=ma

w=mg
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top