[A-level]Latent Heat Question, Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boogeyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy required to evaporate a significant volume of water using the specific latent heat of vaporization. The initial approach incorrectly used volume instead of mass, leading to an erroneous calculation of energy. Participants emphasized the importance of using the density of water to convert volume to mass for accurate results. The correct formula involves calculating mass using the density and volume, which ultimately led to the right answer. The participant acknowledged the mistake and expressed gratitude for the clarification.
Boogeyman
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The specific latent heat of vaporization of water at 28\circC is 2.3 x 106JKg-1. It has been estimated that 1.2 x 1012 m3 of water is evaporated per day from the Earth's surface.

Given that the density of water is 1 x 103 kgm-3calculate the energy required to evaporate this volume of water.



The Attempt at a Solution



I'm thinking since the water is just evaporating and not boiling, the energy needed would be the heat required to just evaporate the water:

EH=mwater x latent heat
=2.67 x 1018J

But this is wrong. I realize I have not used the density of water but I do not know how to apply it. Is this question asking me to find the increase in internal energy?

In any case the volume of water is 1.02 x 109m3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Boogeyman said:
EH=mwater x latent heat

What did you use for the mass of water? You need to find the mass using mwater=ρV
 
rock.freak667 said:
What did you use for the mass of water? You need to find the mass using mwater=ρV

:frown:

I cannot believe I made such a silly mistake. For some reason I always saw the volume as the mass.

Anyways I got the correct answer now. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top