A line of charge as a delta function

AI Thread Summary
To express a line of charge with charge per unit length λ as a delta function volume charge density in cylindrical coordinates, the correct formulation is ρ(r') = (1/a)λδ(r' - a)δ(φ' - φ₀), assuming the line is infinite, parallel to the z-axis, and at a distance a from the origin. The discussion confirms that this formulation satisfies the integration requirement for a 2-D delta function in the x-y plane. Additionally, the rectangular coordinate version of the charge density is also deemed correct. The units of the charge density are verified to be appropriate, ensuring the formulation is physically meaningful. This approach effectively represents the line of charge in both cylindrical and rectangular coordinates.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Can someone tell me how to express a line of charge of charge per unit length \lambda as a delta function volume charge density in cylindrical coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, here's my guess:

<br /> \rho(\vec{r}&#039;) = \frac{1}{a}\lambda \delta(r&#039; - a) \delta (\phi&#039; - \phi_0).<br />

Assuming that the line of charge is infinite, parallel to the z-axis, a distance a from the origin, and at an angle \phi = \phi_0[/tex] w.r.t. the x-axis. Sound good?
 
...anyone? Please?

Would this be the correct charge density in rectangular coordinates:

<br /> \rho(\mathbf{r}&#039;) = \lambda \delta(x&#039; - a) \delta (y&#039; - a)<br />
 
AxiomOfChoice said:
Ok, here's my guess:

<br /> \rho(\vec{r}&#039;) = \frac{1}{a}\lambda \delta(r&#039; - a) \delta (\phi&#039; - \phi_0).<br />

Assuming that the line of charge is infinite, parallel to the z-axis, a distance a from the origin, and at an angle \phi = \phi_0[/tex] w.r.t. the x-axis. Sound good?
<br /> <br /> This is correct. Why? There are two things: first the 2-D delta function is right, and second, the charge density is right. First the delta function. You are integrating over an area in the x-y plane, so <br /> &lt;br /&gt; dA = r\, d\phi \, dr.&lt;br /&gt;<br /> You require your 2-D delta function \delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{\rho}) to satisfy<br /> &lt;br /&gt; f(a,\phi_0) = \int \, dA \, \delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{\rho}) \, f(r, \phi).&lt;br /&gt;<br /> Above, \mathbf{\rho} is your source location in the x-y plane, and \delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{\rho}) is simply a symbol to represent the delta function that you are looking for. Clearly your choice above satisfies this:<br /> &lt;br /&gt; \int dr \, \int r\, d\phi \, \frac{1}{a} \delta(r - a) \delta (\phi - \phi_0) \, f(r, \phi)&lt;br /&gt; = \int dr \, r\, \frac{1}{a} \delta(r - a) \, f(r, \phi_0)&lt;br /&gt; = a \frac{1}{a} f(a,\phi_0) = f(a,\phi_0).&lt;br /&gt;<br /> Note that your cartesian coordinate version you posted is also okay.<br /> <br /> Now for the charge density. Beyond the delta function you basically just need to make sure you have the right units. your &quot;r&quot; delta function has units of one over length, so your charge density has teh right units.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top