A link from complex number to hypercomplex numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between complex numbers and hypercomplex numbers, particularly in the context of problem-solving. It highlights that complex numbers were developed to address issues with real numbers, such as finding square roots of negative numbers. The inquiry focuses on whether there are problems that require hypercomplex numbers, similar to how complex numbers arose from limitations in real numbers. Additionally, it questions whether hypercomplex numbers are merely an extension of complex numbers by adding dimensions. The conversation emphasizes the evolution of number systems in response to mathematical challenges.
Den Webi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If i understand correctly, the discovery of complex numbers was linked to solving real number problems, s.a. finding square roots of negative numbers. In other words, at first there was a problem that was formulated using real numbers only that had no real number solutions, which lead to extending the concept of numbers to include complex numbers.

Is there a similar problem that uses complex numbers only but has no complex number solution and requires the introduction of hypercomplex numbers?

Or is it that hypercomplex numbers were discovered/invented by simply adding extra dimensions to complex numbers?

Thank you in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Khashishi, thank you so much, that's exactly what i was looking for!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top