A little help understanding how you get from one step to the next

  • Thread starter Thread starter SMOF
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding a step in a digital signal processing problem involving the functions w(t), x(t), and y(t). The user is confused about transitioning from the equation 2w(t) = ej100t + e-j100t + ej100t + pi/3 + e -j100t - pi/3 to 2w(t) = ej100t(ejpi/3+1) + e-j100t(e-jpi/3+1). Clarifications are provided, emphasizing the need to factor out common terms and apply trigonometric identities. The conversation highlights the importance of careful notation and the use of identities in simplifying expressions. The user expresses gratitude for the assistance in resolving their confusion.
SMOF
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I hope I am posting this is in the right section. It is not a home work question, it is from a solution to a tutorial, and I just cannot see how the lecturer has gotten from one step to the next. If I don't get the solution here, I will ask him, but that will be later next week, and I would like to understand it now.

Anyway. It is a question relating to a digital signal processing class, and we were asked to show analytically that

w(t) = r cos(100t+∅).

In the question, we are told that x(t) = cos(100t) and y(t) = cos(100t + \pi) where w(t) = x(t) + y(t).

The part I am having an issue with is from this line

2w(t) = ej100t + e-j100t + ej100t + pi/3 + e -j100t - pi/3

To this line

2w(t) = ej100t(ejpi/3+1) + e-j100t(e-jpi/3+1)

I am sure it is a pretty basic step, but I just cannot see it, and I have no issues with other harder sections, but this is just a mental block for me.

Thanks in advance for any help you can gove me.

Seán
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In your next to the last line you left out j multiplying pi/3 in both expressions. The exponent should be j(110t + pi/3), although I am puzzled where the /3 came from, since the original y doesn't have it.
 
Oh, that's me been silly, I was too worried about getting all the main equations right with the html tags and what have you ...it is y(x) = cos(100t +pi/3).

Sorry.

If by the second to last line you mean 2w(t) = ej100t + e-j100t + ej100t + pi/3 + e -j100t - pi/3 ...that's how it is in the solution.

Seán
 
SMOF said:
The part I am having an issue with is from this line

2w(t) = ej100t + e-j100t + ej100t + pi/3 + e -j100t - pi/3

To this line

2w(t) = ej100t(ejpi/3+1) + e-j100t(e-jpi/3+1)

On the first line, rewrite ej100t as ej100t*1, ej100t + pi/3 as ej100t*epi/3. Now collect the terms of ej100t, yielding ej100t + ej100t + pi/3 = ej100t(1+epi/3). Do the same for the other two terms and you get the second line.There is an easier way to address this if you remember your half angle formulae and some identities based on these. One such identity is

\cos a + \cos(a+b) = 2\cos\frac b 2 \cos(a+\frac b 2)

It is a good one to keep this identity in your head, at least in structure. You don't need to know the identity by heart, but it is good to know the general nature of the identity as it does come up quite a bit.
 
That's great, thanks a lot!

Seán
 
SMOF said:
Oh, that's me been silly, I was too worried about getting all the main equations right with the html tags and what have you ...it is y(x) = cos(100t +pi/3).

Sorry.

If by the second to last line you mean 2w(t) = ej100t + e-j100t + ej100t + pi/3 + e -j100t - pi/3 ...that's how it is in the solution.

Seán
It looks to me that a parenthesis pair is missing from the exponent in each term. It is corrected in the last line.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top