A mass attached to two springs with different k values

  • Thread starter Thread starter darrenhb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Springs
AI Thread Summary
A mass attached to two springs with different spring constants (k1 and k2) experiences a total restoring force calculated as F = -k1x - k2x, leading to an effective spring constant of k = k1 + k2. This indicates that the springs behave as if they are in parallel, not in series. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the configuration of springs when analyzing their combined effects on frequency and force. Further exploration of the scenario where the springs are connected in series is suggested for a deeper understanding. The initial analysis regarding the combined k values is confirmed as correct.
darrenhb
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey. Suppose a mass is attached to two springs, one on each side, and they have different values for k. If you wanted to measure the frequency, how would you add up the k values? Would it work as if they were in series, so 1/k = 1/k1 + 1/k2, or would it just be k = k1 + k2 like in parallel? Or something else?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See if you can figure it out. Imagine the mass pushed a distance X from equilibrium. What's the total restoring force from the two springs?
 
What I figured was that it would be F = -k1x - k2x, and therefore k = k1 + k2. Is this correct?

I always over-think these things!
 
darrenhb said:
What I figured was that it would be F = -k1x - k2x, and therefore k = k1 + k2. Is this correct?
You got it. :approve:

(Now you should figure out how things would be different if the springs were connected together in series.)
 
Thanks! I'll give that a go later, haha.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top