A Moment Please: Help MiYu with the Test Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miyu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a test question concerning forces and moments related to a winch system. The user MiYu seeks clarification on how to approach the problem, which involves applying Newton's third law and balancing forces and torques. The analysis shows that the net force is zero, leading to the equations 200 + R2 - R1 = 0 and 200*40 - R1*2 - R2*2 = 0. After solving these equations, the results indicate R1 = 2100 and R2 = 1900. The explanation provided successfully clarifies MiYu's doubts.
Miyu
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A "moment" please...

Hello everyone!

Well, I found this moment question in a test paper...so if you know how to answer it please do help me clarify my doubts!


Pls visit:
http://sg.geocities.com/be_do_get/Qn3a.doc

It takes a while to load, so be patient!

Thank you!

Love, MiYu.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The pegs are fixed relative to the winch. When a force (effort) is applied, the handle bar pushes against peg A to the left, so peg A exerts an opposite and equal force to the right (Newton's third law). Similarly, the handle bar pushes against peg B to the right, so peg B exerts an opposite and equal force to the left. R1 and R2 are in opposite directions because one is above the center of the winch while the other is below the center of the winch.

The center of the winch does not undergo any translational motion.
Hence the net force is 0. 200+R2-R1 = 0.

Also balance the torques (i.e., the "moments") since there is no rotation about the center of the winch unless the exerted force > 200. Let torques that point out of the page be +, and those that point into the page be -.
200*40-R1*2-R2*2 = 0.



Solve[{200 + R2 - R1 == 0, 200*40 - R1*2 - R2*2 == 0}, {R1, R2}]{{R1 -> 2100, R2 -> 1900}}
Solving these two equations (on Mathematica), I get R1 = 2100 and R2 = 1900.

Hope this helps!
--Ying
 
Gee thanks! I've understood! ^^
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top