A possible uncrossable boarder between bradyons and hypothetical tachyons

  • Thread starter Thread starter Willowz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hypothetical
Willowz
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
A possible "uncrossable" boarder between bradyons and hypothetical tachyons...

I would like to ask about a correlation between baryonic matter and hypothetical tachyons.
(For ordinary bradyonic matter, E increases with increasing velocity, becoming arbitrarily large as v approaches c, the speed of light.) Therefore, just as bradyons are forbidden to break the light-speed barrier, so too are tachyons forbidden from slowing down to below c, since to reach the barrier from either above or below requires infinite energy.
From this I assume that there is a barrier between the highest speed a bradyon can achieve(infinetly close to c) and the lowest speed a tachyon could achieve(?)...
the speed of a tachyon increases as its energy decreases") and ("the speed of a bradyon increases as its energy increases")
So from the above I could assume that for the bradyon: v~e, and for the tachyon v~1/e. I'm not great at maths or physics, but could someone help me equate the two. Or maybe it would be better to equate e=mc^2(bradyon) and e^(-1)=mc^2 ?(tachyon)...but now I think we would need complex numbers. :( Thanks for any help
Maybe it's just c that can't be achieved by anything other than light?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Maybe the sub-forum is wrong. Could a mod move this topic into "Particle Physics"?
 


I think this is the right forum, since tachyons aren't part of any mainstream particle physics model, they are a hypothetical idea from relativity. It's assumed that for both bradyons and tachyons, the total energy is given by the formula E = \gamma mc^2 (which is another way of writing the relativistic equation E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 c^2, where p is the relativistic momentum p = \gamma mv...the formula E = mc^2 is only intended to apply in a particle's own rest frame, for particles which aren't at rest you need an expanded equation which includes the kinetic energy due to motion). However, since the relativistic gamma factor \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}} becomes imaginary when v > c, it is assumed that in order for tachyons to have real-valued energy and momentum, their rest mass m must be imaginary (see this page). You can see that with this assumption, E in the equation E = \gamma mc^2 = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}} can be a real number (since imaginary * imaginary = real), and its value approaches infinity as v approaches c from above.
 
Last edited:


Thanks for the reply. I wanted to ask. If bradyons can't achieve c, and tachyons can't achieve c. And only light can move at c, then is it possible for one of the two to ever "jump" over this barrier of c? What is stopping them from doing so? Thanks for any replies.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
50
Views
6K
Back
Top