krishna mohan
- 114
- 0
Hi...
I have been pondering over this problem for sometime...
This is problem no 4-9 in Binney and Tremaine's Galactic Dynamics first edition...
In a singular isothermal sphere with an isotropic dispersion tensor, the RMS speed is \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c, where v_c is the circular speed. In a system with the same mass distribution, but with all stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, the RMS speed is v_c.
Thus, the two systems have identical density distributions but different amounts of kinetic energy per star.
How is this consistent with the virial theorem?
Can anyone suggest anything?
I have been pondering over this problem for sometime...
This is problem no 4-9 in Binney and Tremaine's Galactic Dynamics first edition...
In a singular isothermal sphere with an isotropic dispersion tensor, the RMS speed is \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c, where v_c is the circular speed. In a system with the same mass distribution, but with all stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, the RMS speed is v_c.
Thus, the two systems have identical density distributions but different amounts of kinetic energy per star.
How is this consistent with the virial theorem?
Can anyone suggest anything?