A problem from Binney and Tremaine

  • Thread starter Thread starter krishna mohan
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem from Binney and Tremaine's "Galactic Dynamics" regarding the differences in RMS speed between two systems with identical mass distributions. In a singular isothermal sphere, the RMS speed is derived as √(3/2)v_c, while in a system with stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, it is simply v_c. This raises questions about consistency with the virial theorem, which applies to systems in virial equilibrium. The key point is that in an isothermal sphere, the circular velocity is constant across all radii, whereas in other mass distributions, it varies with radius. Thus, the differences in kinetic energy per star can be reconciled with the virial theorem when considering the nature of circular velocities in different systems.
krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Hi...

I have been pondering over this problem for sometime...
This is problem no 4-9 in Binney and Tremaine's Galactic Dynamics first edition...

In a singular isothermal sphere with an isotropic dispersion tensor, the RMS speed is \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c, where v_c is the circular speed. In a system with the same mass distribution, but with all stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, the RMS speed is v_c.
Thus, the two systems have identical density distributions but different amounts of kinetic energy per star.
How is this consistent with the virial theorem?

Can anyone suggest anything?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For some reason, am not able to edit this post.
Please see the new post on the same topic.
 
The virial theorem is about the system as a whole, when it is in virial equilibrium. The v_c that you quote here is not a unique number for every star. In case of an isothermal sphere it is, as the mass distribution it has is such that the velocity is constant, as a function of radius. For all other mass distributions, v_c is a function of r, and the mass enclosed within r (M(r)): v_c^2 = M(r)/r So for any given mass distribution other than isothermal, the circular velocity is not constant. If all stars move on circular orbits, they will all have v_c as their velocity, but the value of v_c depends on the radii of all other orbits.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top