A problem in understanding distributions exercise

Goldbeetle
Messages
210
Reaction score
1
I'm reading the first chapters of "A Guide to Distribution Theory and Fourier Transforms".
On page 10, Exercises 3,6,7 the distribution is defined in terms of integrals. The first one is always without integrand (there's only the integral sign). What does that mean? Am I missing something? The book can be consulted online in Google Books.

Thanks for any help!

Goldbeetle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is just you intergrate over two disconnected ranges (-inf,-a) + (+a,+inf).
 
Exactly

\int_{-\infty}^{-a}+\int_{a}^{\infty}\;f(x)dx=\int_{-\infty}^{-a}\;f(x)\;dx+\int_{a}^{\infty}\;f(x)\;dx
 
OK, thanks.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top