A problem Sean Carroll's book about Killing vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter shichao116
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Vectors
shichao116
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(This is problem 12 of Chapter 3 in Sean Carroll's book: Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity.)
Show that any Killing vector K^\mu satisfies the following relations:
\nabla_\mu\nabla_\sigma K^\rho = R^\rho_{\sigma\mu\nu}K^\nu
K^\lambda\nabla_\lambda R = 0

Where R is Riemann tensor.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I can prove the first one by using the definition of Riemann tensor, i.e. the commutator of two covariant derivatives, Killing equations associated with Killing vector, and Bianchi identity.

But for the second one, in the book it is said that we can prove it by contracting the first equation, i.e.
\nabla_\mu\nabla_\sigma K^\mu = R_{\sigma\nu}K^\nu
and the contracted Bianchi identity
\nabla_\mu(R^{\mu\nu}-1/2g^{\mu\nu}R)=0

What I do is multiplying Killing vector to the contracted Bianchi identity and then I get to where I stuck:
1/2K^\mu\nabla_\mu R = K_\nu\nabla_\mu R^{\mu\nu}

obviously the left hand side is what we need to prove to be zero. But I failed to show the right hand side to be zero after tried many ways.

Can anyone give me some clue how to do that ?

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shichao116 said:
What I do is multiplying Killing vector to the contracted Bianchi identity and then I get to where I stuck:
1/2K^\mu\nabla_\mu R = K_\nu\nabla_\mu R^{\mu\nu}

Use the product rule

K_\nu\nabla_\mu R^{\mu\nu} =\nabla_\mu( K_\nu R^{\mu\nu}) - R^{\mu\nu}\nabla_\mu K_\nu.

Then you should be able to use the first identity and the Killing equation to see that both terms vanish.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top