A Puzzling Paradox: Can Light Reach Infinite Velocity?

Paindealer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Don't get this...

OK, I know it is impossible to reach the speed of light, but, yeah, so, ummm...

If one could reach the speed of light time stopps,but then light always travels at the speed of light. If time stops for something at the speed of light, then wouldn't it stop for light, maaking light go a distance over 0 time, giving it infinite velocity? Even though it is like 300,000,000m/s and that is a big number, it isn't infinite so how can time come to a complete stop if one was to reach the speed of light?

I don't get that so someone please inject some brains into my ears so I will understand that lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The proper time concept is really irrelevant to light because it is the time experienced in a rest frame and light has no rest frame. The photon just doesn't experience time; a photon that left a distant galaxy a billion years ago, by OUR time, and just now entered your retina has not experienced any time at all on its flight. Not even, really, zero time.
 
Paindealer said:
OK, I know it is impossible to reach the speed of light, but, yeah, so, ummm...

If one could reach the speed of light time stopps,but then light always travels at the speed of light. If time stops for something at the speed of light, then wouldn't it stop for light, maaking light go a distance over 0 time, giving it infinite velocity? Even though it is like 300,000,000m/s and that is a big number, it isn't infinite so how can time come to a complete stop if one was to reach the speed of light?

I don't get that so someone please inject some brains into my ears so I will understand that lol.
Try to synchronize a clock comoving with the photon
 
Paindealer said:
If time stops for something at the speed of light, then wouldn't it stop for light, maaking light go a distance over 0 time, giving it infinite velocity?
Yes, you could say that.

But time stopping for the light doesn't mean an infinite speed from an external observer's point of view, it means infinite from an internal observer's point of view.

Light (photons) do not experience time at all. They "see" the entire universe in one instant - as if they really are traveling at infinite speed - in their own frame of reference, that is.


(Caveat: as many posts are likely about to tell you, it is meaningless to speak about photons "seeing" anything, or even a frame of reference moving at c. This is true, but as a fellow layperson, I understand how it can help to loosen the rules to make a leap of understanding. Keep in mind though, that faulty analogies (such as mine, and the clock Bernhard mentions) will eventually steer you awry.)
 

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

I A question about the speed of light and electromagnetism
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
B Why does it require an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light?
3
Replies
130
Views
13K
B The expansion of the Universe and time travel (By a non-scientist)
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Prove the velocity of a moving object is absolute in one IRF?
Replies
22
Views
1K
B New Paradox Discovered, I Think
2
Replies
98
Views
7K
B Let me ask a thing about the Speed of Light
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Is Erik's Paradox Challenging Our Understanding of Gravity and Light Speed?
Replies
18
Views
2K
B Energy, Mass, Speed of Light: Can We Reach It?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Understanding Spacetime simultaneity in twin paradox scenarios
Replies
35
Views
3K
B Einstein thought experiment confusion: “light clock in a moving frame”
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top