A question about champagne bubbles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raparicio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubbles
AI Thread Summary
Champagne bubbles rise in lines due to surface imperfections on the glass that create depressions, allowing bubbles to collect and ascend together. They travel at a constant velocity because the buoyant forces balance gravitational forces and fluid resistance. While bubbles initially accelerate when formed, their small size means this acceleration is often imperceptible. The formation of bubbles occurs only after opening the bottle because the pressure is released, allowing dissolved gas to escape. Overall, the dynamics of bubble movement in champagne involve a combination of buoyancy, pressure changes, and interactions with the glass surface.
Raparicio
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
This is an interesting questions that occurs when we have a glass of champagne (or cava).

why all the bubbles that are born in one point, are lineed when they go to surface?

An the other hand: why are they at constant velocity, and not with acceleration?

Chin chin!

R. Aparicio.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are my thoughts.

The reason something travels at constant velocity is because the forces acting on it are balanced. In the case of champagne bubbles, the buoyant forces balance the gravitational forces and fluid resistance when the bubbles are rising at a constant speed.

Now then, bubbles are pretty small, light things, so naturally, they float in champagne. However, their smallness also means that they accelerate quickly having been formed (like a truck takes longer to accelerate than a motorbike, for example). So the fact is, for a portion of the bubble's life, it is accelerating; it just happens so quickly you probably don't notice it.

Another element which might have crossed your mind is the hydrostatic pressure gradient between the top and bottom of the glass, causing the bubbles to change size on their journey. In any case, even the tallest champagne flutes probably aren't tall enough for this to make a difference.
 
Champagne

Dear brewnog

I am more or less in the same direction than you. I think that bubbles are one just near the other becouse the upper bubble has a depresion, and goes in the must simple way.

By the other hand, I thing that velocity is really constant, but becouse of the virtual mass or something like this. Bubbles will change in the way to up, but I thing mass of bubbles is not significative in comparation with Champagne (or cava) density.

I will think it a little more. Is only a christmas curiosity.

Best reggards.
 
Sorry Raparicio, I think I misunderstood your original question slightly.


As for the reason the bubbles float up in lines following on from one another, I would like to think that this is due to surface imperfections on the glass causing the bubbles to collect at 'peaks' on the glass surface (since the glass is not completely smooth). The effect is similar to raindrops falling off a leaf.

The reason that bubbles travel in straight lines is simple enough.



If you find the language barrier difficult, I'm sure that Clausius2 would be happy to respond to a private message in Spanish.
 
Here is a question for you:

Why do the bubbles form? And why don't they form before you open the bottle, only after?
 
Oxymoron said:
Here is a question for you:

Why do the bubbles form? And why don't they form before you open the bottle, only after?

Becouse of the presure?

I think that the liquid part has a cuantity of gas, that only "escapes" when presure is not atmosferic.

I don't know exactly, only is a suposition.

And, what about the incremental mass becouse of the "induced mass"?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top