A question about Marion&Thornton book on Classical Mechanics (year 2)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the suitability of "Introduction Classical Dynamics of Particles & Systems" by Marion and Thornton for a second-year undergraduate physics course. While some participants regard it as a traditional and decent choice, others criticize it as outdated compared to more advanced texts. Goldstein's book is highlighted as a graduate-level resource, making it less appropriate for undergraduates. Recommendations for alternative texts include Cassiday & Fowles for a solid introduction and Hand & Finch for undergraduate dynamics. José & Saletan are suggested for more advanced study, while Landau is noted as excellent but not ideal for beginners in classical dynamics. Overall, opinions vary on the effectiveness of Marion and Thornton, with a consensus leaning towards seeking more modern alternatives for deeper understanding.
droblly
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I am wondering if Introduction Classical Dynamics of Particles & Systems (5 ed.) by Marion and Thornton is any good?
I have already studied year 1 Classical Mechanics course, using University Physics by Young and Freedman.
May I know if Marion&Thornton book is of higher level and suitable for year 2 undergrad Physics?
Would you recommend Goldstein or Thornton?

With thanks,
Felicity
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Goldstein is a honours level book. I am using Cassiday & Fowles, and I think it makes an excellent introduction to a book like Landau and Lifshi*tz, which would follow it very nicely.
P.S. my prof says Marion and Thornton is a good book.
 
Marion & Thornton is a pretty traditional book for undergraduate dynamics.

Traditional, but kind of crappy. Goldstein is in an entirely different league though, since it is supposed to be a graduate text.

Personally I like Hand & Finch for undergraduate dynamics, and José & Saletan at a more advanced level. Landau is a great text, but not for someone learning classical dynamics.
 
Thank you guys =)
I appreciate your help.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top