A question about optical theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical Theorem
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Optical theorem says that total cross section proportion to elastic scattering amplitude in the forward direction.Then if the target is absolutely reflective ''mirror''(in the case of quantum mechanics:scattering potential=infinity(r<a) and de Broglie wave leng limits to 0),in this case the scattering amplitude in forward direction is zero,but the total cross section is nonzero (because of reflection).So I do not understand the optical theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In wave optics the forward scattering amplitude is never zero. I.e. even behind some metallic mirror (in the distance of several hundred meters) a bright spot will appear in the shadow zone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot
 
Last edited:
And what about in the case of quantum mechanics?And in optics the thicker metalic mirror the smaller the total cross section?Because the thicker mirror the weaker the forward scattering.
 
Now,I understand that it is not only because tunneling through barrier,but also because diffraction making the spot after mirror.
 
But in case incident flux having diameter of the beam is very small comparision with diameter of the ''mirror'' and in classical limit(de Broglie wave leng tends to zero) and the momentum of particle is absolutely defined.So I think that having only reflection,but not having diffraction,then in this case there were not Arago spot?
 
ndung200790 said:
But in case incident flux having diameter of the beam is very small comparision with diameter of the ''mirror''

I think the optical theorem refers to an incident plane wave. If the diameter of the incident beam is restricted, then you first have to decompose it in a plane wave basis.
 
In case the diameter of mirror large enough(the region of scattering potential),then we can consider the incident flux is plane wave despite of the diameter of incident beam is narrower than that of mirror(and in classical limit).In this case,with unitary property of S matrix we deduce the optical theorem.Then we are led to the transfer amplitude allways exists,despite of the scattering potential limits to infinity?
 
Back
Top