Quantum Mechanical Scattering (3D) - What about forward scattering?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical treatment of forward scattering in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM), specifically addressing how the differential cross section, represented as dσ/dΩ = |f(θ, φ)|², accounts for both scattered and unscattered incident waves. The incident plane wave ψ(z) = Ae^{ikz} interacts with a scattering potential, resulting in an outgoing spherical wave. The interference between the incident and scattered waves in the forward direction (θ = 0) necessitates a deeper understanding of the relationship between the forward scattering amplitude f(0) and the total cross section, as highlighted in Roger Newton's "Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM)
  • Familiarity with scattering theory concepts
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their asymptotic forms
  • Basic grasp of differential cross sections in quantum scattering
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Roger Newton's "Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles" for detailed insights on forward scattering
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of the relationship between f(0) and total cross section
  • Research interference effects in quantum scattering scenarios
  • Examine differential cross section calculations in various scattering potentials
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in scattering theory, and researchers interested in the mathematical intricacies of wave-particle interactions.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Quantum Mechanical Scattering (3D) -- What about forward scattering?

Hi

In nonrelativistic QM, the standard way to solve the 3D scattering problem is to consider an incident plane wave [itex]\psi(z) = Ae^{ikz}[/itex] which encounters a scattering potential, producing an outgoing spherical wave having the asymptotic form

[tex]\psi(r, \theta, \phi) = A\left\{e^{ikz} + f(\theta,\phi)\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\right\}[/tex]

This of course corresponds to

[tex]\frac{d\sigma(\theta,\phi)}{d\Omega} = |f(\theta, \phi)|^2[/tex]

My question is: in the "forward" direction ([itex]\theta = 0[/itex]) we have both the scattered wave as well as some of the incident wave that hasn't been scattered. But the differential cross section above only corresponds to the scattered wave. How does one mathematically account for the ticks a detector placed in the forward direction will register due to the un-scattered incident wave?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Have you taken a look at Roger Newton's Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles ?
 


The scattered and incident waves interfere in the forward direction.
This leads to a relation between I am f(0) and the total cross section.
It should be discussed in any QM textbook that considers scattering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
527
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K