Is One Textbook Enough for Self-Studying Undergraduate Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Learning all the mathematics required for undergraduate physics from a single mathematical methods textbook is generally considered insufficient. While a comprehensive text may cover many necessary topics, it is unlikely to encompass all the depth and breadth needed for a full understanding of undergraduate physics. A foundational calculus book, such as Stewart's, is recommended as a starting point to build essential skills before tackling more advanced topics. Additionally, resources like Boas' "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" can serve as a valuable supplement, but students should be prepared to consult additional texts on differential equations, calculus, and linear algebra for clarification on complex concepts. This multi-text approach allows for a more thorough grasp of the mathematical principles essential for physics.
m.gigantic
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can Someone learn all mathematics required for undergraduate physics from only one textbook (mathematical methods in physics texts ) prior to knowing anything in physics especially if he want to self study ? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this method? If I have superficial knowledge in calculus , Can I only read it in a mathematical methods textbook ( I have Riley , Hobson and Bence book which include a chapter on elementary calculus )? Or should I read a calculus book at the level of Stewart book for example ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
m.gigantic said:
Can Someone learn all mathematics required for undergraduate physics from only one textbook (mathematical methods in physics texts ) prior to knowing anything in physics especially if he want to self study ?

All of undergraduate physics? No. Well... maybe if it was a really big book.
 
Probably not one book, but you can follow the standard curriculum set in a uni:

First would be a calculus book, like Stewart's.

Second maybe Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences. I think the second edition you can get super cheap.

Anything you don't understand in Boas you can get clarification in a Diff EQ, Calc, or a Linear Algebra book.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top