A question about solving the energy eigenvalue of a given Hamiltonian operator

ee_mike
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The problem is

A particle of mass m and electric charges q can move only in one dimension and is subject to a harmonic force and a homogeneous electrostatic field. The Hamiltonian operator for the system is
H= p2/2m +mw2/2*x2 - qεx

a. solve the energy eigenvalue problem
b. if the system is initially in the ground state of the unperturbed harmonic oscillator, ket= |0>, what is the probability of finding it in the ground state of the full Hamiltonian?

Could anybody offer some methods to handle this question? Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it you have solved the harmonic oscillator.

This question is pretty much the same. The trick is to complete the square of the coordinate x-dependent part. That is, turn this:

ax^2 + bx

into this:

a(x+\frac{b}{2a})^2 - (\frac{b}{2a})^2

From there you should recognise the harmonic oscillator, only this time with some shifted origin plus a constant term in you Hamiltonian (which you shouldn't throw away).
 
xepma said:
I take it you have solved the harmonic oscillator.

This question is pretty much the same. The trick is to complete the square of the coordinate x-dependent part. That is, turn this:

ax^2 + bx

into this:

a(x+\frac{b}{2a})^2 - (\frac{b}{2a})^2

From there you should recognise the harmonic oscillator, only this time with some shifted origin plus a constant term in you Hamiltonian (which you shouldn't throw away).


Could you explain more detailedly? Because I wonder what is the eigenvalue of a(x+\frac{b}{2a})^2 - (\frac{b}{2a})^2

Thank you very much, you really helped me.
 
So you start out with the basic eigenvalue equation:

H\psi = E \psi

where, for simplicity, we have

H = T + ax^2 + bx

where T is short for the kinetic energy.
Filling this in gives you the following eigenvalue equation:

(T + ax^2 + bx )\psi = E \psi

Now you perform the trick I explained earlier, which give you:

\left(T + a(x+\frac{b}{2a})^2-(\frac{b}{2a})^2\right)\psi = E \psi
or:
\left(T + a(x+\frac{b}{2a})^2\right)\psi = (E+(\frac{b}{2a})^2) \psi

Compare this with the standard form of a harmonic oscillator:

\left(T + \frac{m\omega}{2} y^2\right)\psi' = \epsilon \psi'

As you can see, you now have a shifted origin of the harmonic oscillator, and a shifted energy.

I already brought you more than halfway there, so good luck with the rest of the steps ;)
 
xepma said:
So you start out with the basic eigenvalue equation:

H\psi = E \psi

where, for simplicity, we have

H = T + ax^2 + bx

where T is short for the kinetic energy.
Filling this in gives you the following eigenvalue equation:

(T + ax^2 + bx )\psi = E \psi

Now you perform the trick I explained earlier, which give you:

\left(T + a(x+\frac{b}{2a})^2-(\frac{b}{2a})^2\right)\psi = E \psi
or:
\left(T + a(x+\frac{b}{2a})^2\right)\psi = (E+(\frac{b}{2a})^2) \psi

Compare this with the standard form of a harmonic oscillator:

\left(T + \frac{m\omega}{2} y^2\right)\psi' = \epsilon \psi'

As you can see, you now have a shifted origin of the harmonic oscillator, and a shifted energy.

I already brought you more than halfway there, so good luck with the rest of the steps ;)

You are so powerful. I have been doing on this problem since this morning. Thank you very much.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top