A question about submodules

  • Thread starter Artusartos
  • Start date
  • #1
247
0
My textbook says that...

If M is a left R-module, then a submodule N of M...is an additive subgoup N of M closed under scalar multiplication: [tex]rn \in N[/tex] whenever [tex]n \in N[/tex] and [tex]r \in R[/tex].

So if we want to prove that something is a submodule, we need to show that...

1) It closed under scalar multiplication
2) The additive idenitity is in N
3) N is closed under additition
4) If x is in N, then so is its inverse

Right?

But, in the link that I attached, it only shows 1) and 3), right? Can anybody tell me why? Is the proof still considered complete?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
CompuChip
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,302
47
Isn't it as simple as: If (1) holds, set r = 0 to get (2) and r = -1 to get (4)?
(OK, you might want to show that 0n is the additive identity for any n and that -n is the additive inverse of any n).
 
  • #3
247
0
Isn't it as simple as: If (1) holds, set r = 0 to get (2) and r = -1 to get (4)?
(OK, you might want to show that 0n is the additive identity for any n and that -n is the additive inverse of any n).
Thanks.
 
  • #4
mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2020 Award
11,093
1,295
1 does not imply 2, unless the subset considered is non empty. i.e. 1 implies that IF the subset contains anything, then it also contains 0.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on A question about submodules

Replies
2
Views
892
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
985
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
793
Replies
5
Views
790
Top