A question about the Hamiltonian of the fission of Uranium

raeed
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
so I am taking a quantum mechanics course, we started taking about dispersion.
so he the lecturer gave us an example about the fission of uranium by alpha ray... he said that we should place a detector in order to detect the alpha particlee , but the detector can only detect particlees with specific energies and and also specific angles. so he said the Hamiltonian will be H=H0+V, and we will look at V as a perturbation, and thus V=∫([p[2]2m) |p)(p| [d][3]p
he said that its true because the normal hamiltonian H0 contains both continuous states and discreet states.
so my question is how did he get to V and why the H0 contiains continuous and discreet states?
 
The H0 is the (probably simplified) Hamiltonian of the nucleus. Usually one needs a nuclear model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_nucleus#Nuclear_models to write it down. This model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_shell_model resembles the atomic model (for the electron shells and subshells). Atomic hamiltonians are notorious to have also a continuous part of the spectrum which would correspond to the scattering states of the free electrons. His V looks like a free particle Hamiltonian (probably for the alpha particle seen as a different subsystem (the other subsystem would be the nucleus/disintegrated nucleus)).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top