A question about Transcendental numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of transcendental numbers and their relationship to polynomial equations. A transcendental number cannot be the root of any polynomial with rational coefficients, which contradicts the initial claim that all complex and real numbers can be solutions to certain equations involving transcendental numbers. The confusion arises from misunderstanding the nature of polynomial roots and coefficients. The participants clarify that the constant term in a polynomial is considered a coefficient, reinforcing the definition of transcendental numbers. Ultimately, the misunderstanding is resolved, highlighting the importance of accurately grasping mathematical definitions.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
hi pals
assume that m is a Transcendental number.
as you know we have:
x-m=0 => x=m
x^2-m=0 => x=+ or - sqrt(m)
.
.
.
so there must not be even one Transcendental number.
because all complex and real numbers can be the zero(s) of the equations above.
where is the problem?
thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_number" is, by definition, not the zero of a polynomial with rational coefficients.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
isn't 1 rational ?
 
Shyan said:
isn't 1 rational ?

The constant term of the polynomial, in you case m, is also considered a coefficient (of x^0).
 
Shyan said:
hi pals
assume that m is a Transcendental number.
as you know we have:
x-m=0 => x=m
x^2-m=0 => x=+ or - sqrt(m)
.
.
.
so there must not be even one Transcendental number.
because all complex and real numbers can be the zero(s) of the equations above.
where is the problem?
thanks
Do you understand the definition of "transcendental number"? A transcendental number is one that cannot be found as a solution to a polynomial equation with integer coefficients. Saying that "x= + or - sqrt{m}" says nothing about whether x satisfies a polynomial equation with integer coefficient.
 
oh people really excuse me
i understand it now.
sorry for interrupting you
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top