- #1

- 679

- 2

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter kof9595995
- Start date

- #1

- 679

- 2

- #2

- 189

- 0

I had Sakurai's advanced qm a few month ago.

But now I don't. Sorry, I imagine from your sentence.

First, Dirac's solution includes exponential function

[tex]\psi = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{d^3 p}{\sqrt{2E_p}} a_p u(p) e^{-ipx} \cdots[/tex]

Here, both the p (momentum, energy) and x (time , spece) are 4 vectors.

So "px" means scalar (= vector x vector). (px doesn't change under Lorentz transformation.)

And the integration of p is from -infinity to +infinity, so the change from p to p' is meaningless.

But of course, the differentiation by time and space coordinate in Dirac equation changes under Lorentz transformation ( x' = a x ).

[tex]\frac{\partial }{\partial x'_{\mu}} = \sum_{\nu} \frac{\partial x_{\nu}}{\partial x'_{\mu}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{\nu}} = \sum_{\nu} a_{\mu \nu} \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{\nu}} [/tex]

So under Lorentz transformation, Dirac equation becomes

[tex](-i\hbar \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}' + mc) \psi' (x') = (-i\hbar \gamma^{\mu} a_{\mu\nu} \partial_{\nu} + mc) S \psi (x) = (-i\hbar \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} + mc) \psi (x) =0 [/tex]

Is this what is discussed here ? (If not, I transfer your question to someone with advanced qm.)

- #3

George Jones

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 7,539

- 1,354

I won't have access to my copy of Sakarai until tomorrow. Is [itex]S[/itex] the 4-component spinor versionof a Lorentz transformation [itex]L[/itex]? If so, then [itex]x' = Lx[/itex] and

[tex]

\begin{align}

\psi \left( x' \right) &= S \psi \left( x \right) \\

\psi \left( Lx \right) &= S \psi \left( x \right) \\

\psi \left( x \right) &= S \psi \left( L^{-1} x \right)

\end{align}

[/tex]

- #4

- 679

- 2

Yes, S is purely written in terms of gamma matrices and parameters like angle and rapidity, and the expression came into my mind first was [itex]\psi'(x')=S\psi({\Lambda}^{-1}x)[/itex]I won't have access to my copy of Sakarai until tomorrow. Is [itex]S[/itex] the 4-component spinor versionof a Lorentz transformation [itex]L[/itex]? If so, then [itex]x' = Lx[/itex] and

[tex]

\begin{align}

\psi \left( x' \right) &= S \psi \left( x \right) \\

\psi \left( Lx \right) &= S \psi \left( x \right) \\

\psi \left( x \right) &= S \psi \left( L^{-1} x \right)

\end{align}

[/tex]

- #5

- 189

- 0

I won't have access to my copy of Sakarai until tomorrow. Is [itex]S[/itex] the 4-component spinor versionof a Lorentz transformation [itex]L[/itex]? If so, then [itex]x' = Lx[/itex] and

[tex]

\begin{align}

\psi \left( x' \right) &= S \psi \left( x \right) \\

\psi \left( Lx \right) &= S \psi \left( x \right) \\

\psi \left( x \right) &= S \psi \left( L^{-1} x \right)

\end{align}

[/tex]

George Jones, I want to confirm this equation.

According to p.60 of an introduction to quantum field theorey by Peskin, Dirac field change under Lorentz transformation,

[tex] \psi (x) \quad \to \quad \ \psi' (x) = \Lambda_{1/2} \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x) \quad (S = \Lambda_{1/2}) \quad ( x' = \Lambda x ) [/tex]

Changing x to x', this meaning is the same as

[tex]\psi' (x') = \Lambda_{1/2} \psi (x) = S \psi (x) \qquad ( x = \Lambda^{-1} x') [/tex]

S includes gamma matrices, so I think the form of psi changes under Lorentz trandformation.

Yes, S is purely written in terms of gamma matrices and parameters like angle and rapidity, and the expression came into my mind first was [itex]\psi'(x')=S\psi({\Lambda}^{-1}x)[/itex]

Sorry. the next equation is what you mean ?

[tex] \psi' (x') = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x') = S \psi (x) \quad or \quad \psi' (x) = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x) \qquad x' = \Lambda x \quad ( x = \Lambda^{-1} x')[/tex]

- #6

- 679

- 2

Ah..I see where my problem is, I was thinking [tex]\psi' (x) = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x)[/tex], which means an active transformation acting on the wavefunction not the reference frame, so [tex] \psi' (x') = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x') = S \psi (x)[/tex] means Sakurai transformed both the reference frame and the wavefunction? That's weird, why did he do this?Sorry. the next equation is what you mean ?

[tex] \psi' (x') = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x') = S \psi (x) \quad or \quad \psi' (x) = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x) \qquad x' = \Lambda x \quad ( x = \Lambda^{-1} x')[/tex]

- #7

- 189

- 0

Ah..I see where my problem is, I was thinking [tex]\psi' (x) = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x)[/tex], which means an active transformation acting on the wavefunction not the reference frame, so [tex] \psi' (x') = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x') = S \psi (x)[/tex] means Sakurai transformed both the reference frame and the wavefunction? That's weird, why did he do this?

I think it is easier to imagine "

[tex]A^{\mu} (x) = ( A^0 (x), A^1 (x), A^2 (x), A^3 (x) ) \qquad x^{\mu} = (x^0, x^1, x^2, x^3)[/tex]

This 4-vector A (x) means that there is a thing " vector A " at the position of x ( from the viewpoint of reference frame K ).

Here we can consider 4-vector A as an thing such as "arrow".

So there is one "arrow" ( which vector

From the viewpoint of a different reference frame

[tex]x'^{\mu} = \Lambda^{\mu}_{\nu} x^{\nu} \quad ( x' = \Lambda x ) \qquad x'^{\mu} = ( x'^0, x'^1, x'^2, x'^3 )[/tex]

This means that from this reference frame K', the "arrow" exists at

( x' from K' originally exists at x from K. )

How do we see the

A is 4-vector, so this direction changes as 4-vector,

[tex] A'^{\mu} = \Lambda^{\mu}_{\nu} A^{\nu} \quad ( A' = \Lambda A ) [/tex]

As a result, from the reference frame

[tex] A'^{\mu} (x') = \Lambda^{\mu}_{\nu} A^{\nu} ( \Lambda^{-1} x' ) \qquad x = \Lambda^{-1} x'[/tex]

( x' from K' originally exists at x from K. )

In the case of spinor, the position (= x ) of spinor changes as 4-vector, which is the same as that of vector A above.

But the change of "spinor direction" is different from the vector A.

( As you said, we use "S" instead of "Lambda" )

[tex] \psi' (x') = S \psi (\Lambda^{-1} x') [/tex]

Last edited:

- #8

- 679

- 2

Share:

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K