Understanding the Magnetic Field Boundary Conditions for an Infinite Cylinder

  • Thread starter Thread starter michaelsagi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Exam
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the magnetic vector potential and electric field for an infinite cylinder with a uniform volume charge density and a specified magnetic field. Key questions include how to approach the calculation of the magnetic vector potential and the overall electric field, considering both static and induced components. Participants express confusion about whether the electric field is a superposition of static and induced fields and how the boundary conditions relate to the cylinder's behavior. The use of Maxwell's equations is suggested as a straightforward method to solve these problems. Understanding these concepts is essential for applying electromagnetic theory to cylindrical geometries.
michaelsagi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An infinite cylinder (radius a) with a uniform volume charge density rho_v is given. The axis of the cylinder coincides with the z axis. The following magnetic field exists:

B=B0cos(wt+a) for r<=a (i.e., inside the cylinder and on its walls)
B=0 for r>a (i.e., outside the cylinder)

One asks:

1) What is the magnetic vector potential everywhere
2) What is the electric field everywhere
3) What can one learn from the magnetic field boundary conditions


The Attempt at a Solution



Unfortunately, I do not have any clue how to address this question. There is a static charge which generated a static electric field, and there is an induced electric field due to the alternating magnetic field. Is the overall electric field a superposition of the two electric fields or am I mistaken ? Do the boundary conditions imply that the cylinder behaves as an ideal solenoid ? Do I only need to find the rotor of the magnetic field to get the magnetic vector potential ?

Thank you for the help !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's straightforth once you use Maxwell's equations (with vector potential).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top