A question from Weinberg's qft book

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugl0ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Qft
bugl0ver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
can anybody tell me how to induce the quantum field theory
as long as you admit the quantum mechanics and the reletivity?
it seems that in Weinberg's book ,he shows that,but i can not
quite understand:confused:
thank you :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, we really cannot help you if you state your question like this. You need to be a whole lot more specific. What exactly do you want to know ? What concept are you not gettin' ? Please give some reference to a formula, approach, a "name", ... Also tell us something about your situation : are you a college student ?, undergrad ?, How's your QM and special relativity knowledge ?

regards
marlon

ps : i urge you not to use Weinberg's book to study intro QFT. Have you considered Zee's book (QFT in a Nutshell) ? Are you doing this in college ?
 
re

i am a student learning theoretical physics.and i hav read some chapters
of Zee's book.and i think i can follow his idea rather than Weinberg:-p
What i mean is that in many books such like Peskin's just tell us how to
calculate,and it induce the qft so abruptly.
So i think Wein's book will helpful.Maybe my question looks ugly and i think i get my answer myself now.
but what i want to know now is that is qft just a tool in some sence?
thank you:biggrin:
 
QFT is the theoretical model to describe the interactions of many particle systems, caracterized by the fact that the total number of particles does not need to be a constant. This actually is what the "second quantisation" is all about. Particles can be created and annihilated. The biggest difference between QM and QFT is

1) in QM, the total number of particles is constant
2) In QFT, the fundamental property are the FIELDS while in QM they are the wavefunctions.

There are several quantum field theories like QED (describes the EM interaction), QCD (describes the strong force), etc etc


marlon

edit : check out this thread for further clarification
 
You can get QFT by simply applying canonical quantization to classical fields. There's nothing more to it.

Daniel.
 
Hi,

I recommend Dirac's Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. It is about 5 bucks and is well worth it. The 2nd lecture is "The Problem of Quantization".
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
113
Views
9K
Replies
69
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top