A question of roots of riemann function

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
let be the quotient:

Lim_{x->c}\frac{\zeta(1-x)}{\zeta(x)}
where x=c is a root of riemann function... then my question is if that limit is equal to exp(ik) with k any real constant...thanks... the limit is wehn x tends to c bieng c a root of riemann constant
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If c is a trivial root, the answer is clearly no.

If c is a non-trivial root, if you use the functional equation the answer should be clear.
 
eljose said:
my question is if that limit is equal to exp(ik) with k any real constant


no, that can't be true, k surely cannot be *any* real constant? it can at best be *some* real constant.
 
let,s suppose c is a trivial root i mean 0<re(c)<1 i have checked with the functional equation the limit Limx-&gt;c\frac{\zeta(1-x)}{zeta(x)} my question is if we can express this limit as exp(ik) with k some real constant...

i have checked the functional equation for zeta if we call \zeta(1-s)=F(s)\zeta(s) the only thinkg i have proved is that F^*(a+ib)=F(a-ib) (with * complex conjugate) but i don,t know if it will be true that the coefficient is equal to exp(ik).
 
eljose said:
let,s suppose c is a trivial root i mean 0<re(c)<1

if 0<Re(c)<1 it is a NON-trivial root.

\frac{\zeta(1-s)}{\zeta(s)}=\chi(1-s), and I'm sure you know what \chi is despite your continued use of "F".

So it depends on \chi(1-c). If c is on the critical line, this has modulus 1. If c is off the critical line, this may have modulus 1 as well, or it may not.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
932
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top