A question on precipitation reactions

AI Thread Summary
In precipitation reactions, lowering the pH is essential for ensuring that the precipitate forms completely, which is referred to as forming quantitatively. This means that all of the target substance is precipitated out of the solution, allowing for accurate measurement of the amount. In contrast, qualitative precipitation indicates that only some of the substance has precipitated, which does not provide a reliable measure of the total amount present. Understanding this distinction is crucial for effective analysis in chemistry. The discussion emphasizes the importance of pH control in achieving quantitative precipitation.
ASidd
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
My chem textbook says that in precipitation reactions you lower the pH of the reaction in order for the precipitate to form quantitatively.

It doesn't elaborate at all. What is the meaning of precipitate forming quantitatively?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantitatively - you can assume all was precipitated. Qualitatively - only some were precipitated.

First allows determination of an amount, second determination of the presence.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry Calculating the Mass of a Precipitate
Replies
14
Views
11K
Chemistry What precipitates form by mixing 2 saturated solutions?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Ksp and Q precipitate, Why does volume of water matter
Replies
4
Views
3K
Identifying Cations from Insoluble Precipitates - AgCl, Na2SO4 & More
Replies
9
Views
2K
How can you tell what will happen in a reaction?
Replies
6
Views
4K
Magnesium Carbonates Reaction Under Various Test?
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Much Precipitate Forms in a Copper Sulfate and Sodium Hydroxide Reaction?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Identifying Undissolved Silver Halides in Precipitation Reactions
Replies
8
Views
4K
Mass of a precipitate: solubility and Ksp in a chemical reaction
Replies
6
Views
3K
Calculating Yield and Concentrations in a Precipitation Reaction
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top