A questions about Cancelling out brackets.

  • Thread starter Thread starter evosy1978
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cancelling
evosy1978
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I am new here and I am currently studying IGCSE Math. Hope you can explain something to me.

I have what you may think is a basic question... I just wanted to query it.

Its to do with cancelling out brackets.

so
2x-(x+3) = 2x-x-3 = x-3

I think I understand why the +3 inside the brackets changes to a -3. (its because of the minus before the brackets)

So what about the +x inside the brackets aswell? why does this not change to a -x aswell?

and therefore ending up with 2x - -x -3 and then 2x + x - 3

2x - (x+3)
2x - -x -3
2x + x -3 = 3x-3

I hope I have explained my way of thinking clearly? (even though I know its wrong could someone explain why its wrong)

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It did change:

-(x+3) = -x -3

Note that both signs (of x and of 3) changed.

You are trying to change it for the second time.
 
I don't really like rules like "if there is a - in front of the bracket, change the signs". You have to be sure to understand why it is the case.

It simply follows from distributivity:

<br /> \begin{eqnarray*}<br /> 2x-(x+3)<br /> &amp; = &amp; 2x+(-1)*(x+3)\\<br /> &amp; = &amp; 2x + (-1)x + (-1)*3\\<br /> &amp; = &amp; 2x-x-3<br /> \end{eqnarray*}<br />

So instead of remembering a silly rule, just replace the - by (-1)* and work it out by distibutivity.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top