A quick question on Irrational powers

  • Thread starter Thread starter prasannapakkiam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational
prasannapakkiam
I wish to prove that for f(x)=x^x, its domain is: {x E R, x > 0}U{xEZ,x<0}.
I reevaluated to e^(xlnx), obviously that did not help. Is there an algorithm/formula/something that can evaluate irrational powers, so that it can help me with this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From what I understand of your question, you are following a misleading path. The function x^x, when x < 0, is defined at every x = a/b (reduced fraction) such as that b is not an even number. About irrational numbers, the question is ambiguous. For the negative irrationals, what does the expression x^x even mean? For positive irrationals, x^x can be expressed as an infinite series and can be approximated. A negative irrational could be approximated as x = a/b with the condition that b is and odd number and hence we get an approximation of x^x, but it can also be approximated as a/b in which b is an even number and hence yield an imaginary approximation. I have to put much thinking into it, but from this my very quick assumption is that x^x for negative irrationals is an absurd expression.
 
:P I only just realized that I did not define b can be odd. Anyway I require a technique to evaluate powers so that I can personally show that irrational numbers below zero cannot be part of the domain of x^x.
 
Have you tried re-evaluating it to e^{x ln(abs(x))}? It evaluates to the same thing, except of course that it has a "larger" domain than x^x.

Edit: Actually, I rescind this statement--it's not true. I think it might still be helpful for evaluating e^{x ln(x)}, though, so I'll leave it up.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top