A quick Trig Identity Question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter logan233
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
logan233
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hopefully this will make sense...

We have the trig. identities shown below:
sin(u)cos(v) = 0.5[sin(u+v) + sin(u-v)]
cos(u)sin(v) = 0.5[sin(u+v) - sin(u-v)]

How are these different? I realize u and v switched between the sine and cosine functions, but what is the difference between u and v? I recognize that there is a difference between taking sine of a number u and sine of a different number v, and same with taking the cosine of a those numbers, I just don't see how we differentiate between u and v. Like say we have...

x(t) = sin(2πt)cos(2π10t) and we choose u = 2πt and v = 2π10t
so that x1(t) = 0.5[sin(2π11t) + sin(2π9t)]
but what if we choose u = 2π10t and v = 2πt
then x2(t) = 0.5[sin(2π11t) - sin(2π9t)], which is different than the original x(t) even though we simply chose u and v to be different?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
logan233 said:
x(t) = sin(2πt)cos(2π10t) and we choose u = 2πt and v = 2π10t
so that x1(t) = 0.5[sin(2π11t) + sin(2π9t)]
Your mistake is here. The formula is ##0.5[\sin(u+v) + \sin(u-v)]##, so the argument to the second ##\sin## should be ##-2\pi 9 t##, not ##2\pi 9 t##. Then use the fact that ##\sin(-x) = -\sin(x)## to see that the two answers are in fact the same.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh I see now. Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top