A Relativity-Related Thought Experiment that has Given me Trouble

Math Buddy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I'm not a physics major or anything but I have an interest in math and physics. I do know the basics of relativity and with what I know I can't make sense of this. (I came up with this on my drive home after a long calculus lecture, in case you're wondering.)

Imagine that you have an extremely long rope (held taught, without any slack). So long, in fact, that it spans from one side of the universe to the other (assume the rope has no elasticity). Imagine that at each end of this long rope are two different people. Now, one of these people suddenly pulls the rope towards himself, in a straight "tugging" motion.

What does the person at the other end of the pole feel/see at the instant that the first person pulls the rope? Keep in mind that the object is one piece and it spans the entire universe.

If the person pulls the rope, the light from this event occurring would not reach him/her instantaneously, as we all know, since light takes time to travel over long distances. But if the object was truly solid, then the man on the opposite side of the universe should feel the rope move instantly (since the rope is one object.) So he paradoxically sees the rope move but doesn't see it move at the same time.

I am aware that this kind of paradox has been pointed out before, and that Einstein's theories imply that no two events can happen truly instantaneously. However, I believe this case is different because of the solid object between them. Can someone please explain this to me?

On a side note, what does the person who pulled the rope experience after he has made the initial "tug"? If he were to look with a telescope to the other end of the universe, he would see that the rope at the other end has not yet been tugged. But this implies that the rope is longer than it really is, since it is further away from where it started before being "tugged" yet also appears not to have moved on the opposite side of the universe.

I hope I explained this paradox understandably. I brought this up with my dad a few nights ago and he was also unable to provide me with answers. I would really appreciate if someone could shed some light on what occurs in this hpothetical situation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please take a look at our FAQ entry: Can I send a signal faster than light by pushing a rigid rod?

Bottom line: The signal would travel at the speed of sound in the material. No matter how rigid or taut you make the rope, that speed will never exceed the speed of light. There are no perfectly 'rigid' bodies in relativity.
 
Fascinating, thanks for clearing that up!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top