A rubber ball, your family's minivan, and you.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bboy Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Rubber
AI Thread Summary
When a rubber ball is thrown straight up inside a moving minivan, it falls back into the thrower's hand because it retains the forward motion of the van at 35 mph. The ball continues to move at this speed due to inertia, which means no additional force is needed to maintain its motion unless acted upon by another force. This principle aligns with Newton's laws of motion, particularly that a force is only required to change an object's speed or direction. The discussion also highlights that everything on Earth, including the thrower and the minivan, is moving through space at high speeds, yet we perceive vertical motion as straightforward. Understanding these concepts is fundamental to grasping basic physics principles.
Bboy Physics
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Just to be clear, this is NOT a homework question. It's honestly a question I have pondered for as long as I can remember sitting on the backseat of my family's minivan with a rubber ball.

I'd also like to clear out that you bear with me and if I look unintelligent or questionably retarded clinically; I am a simple high school student and new to physics(yet very interested) and I am aware that many of the members are probably veterans themselves and would scoff at a question that might have a very simple answer. But bear with me :smile:

But let's say you were sitting in a minivan moving at the speed limit(for simplicity sake let's say 35mph but it is irrelevant) and say you were sitting in the back of the van. Now say you had a rubber ball, and you throw this ball into the air. What happens is that ball just falls back into your hand(assuming you shot it straight up). But why doesn't the ball just hit you in the face after you throw it into the air, since once you let go of ball, there is nothing to keep it moving at the same speed as you or the car?

For Einstein's box and person with a ball equivalency for his theory of relativity, Einstein said that if a box with a person in it holding a ball were to fall towards the Earth from its atmosphere at g, the person would be free falling. But if the ball were let go from the free falling person, the ball would also seem like it's floating and motionless. Now the reason why it does that is because of gravity: everything falls at the same speed(regarding air friction and other external variables) and so it's logical as to why the ball does not hit the inside of the top of the box, simply because it is falling at the same rate of the box and person due to gravity.

But what about the minivan, there is no force that moves the ball at 35mph forwards(anymore, since me holding the ball and I with my butt on the seat). So what causes it to make it so that it's going straight up and down?

To be clear I want to know the force that keeps the ball moving at the constant speed of the van despite nothing touching the ball after you throw it straight up.

The reason I put this in the GToR section is because of the box and person analogy; I didn't know where else to put it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bboy Physics said:
But what about the minivan, there is no force that moves the ball at 35mph forwards(anymore, since me holding the ball and I with my butt on the seat). So what causes it to just look like it's going straight up and down?

The ball is moving at 35 mph while it's in your hands, right? You take your hands off the ball and it's still moving at 35 mph along with you and everything else in the minivan. There's no reason for it to slow down relative to you.

You could ask the same question about why the ball goes straight up and down again when you're just standing around outside. You aren't in a minivan moving at 35 mph... But you are standing on a planet that is rushing through space at many miles per second, and you don't even notice.

Your best bet would be to be to read up on Newton's three laws; that's the starting point for understanding all physics.
(and don't be surprised if the moderators move this thread into "general physics")
 
Bboy Physics said:
To be clear I want to know the force that keeps the ball moving at the constant speed of the van despite nothing touching the ball after you throw it straight up.

No force is needed to keep something moving - force is only needed to change the speed

(or to cancel out some other force that is working to slow the object, such as friction.)
 
Nugatory said:
No force is needed to keep something moving - force is only needed to change the speed

(or to cancel out some other force that is working to slow the object, such as friction.)

Ah! This helps deeply. Much appreciated! And the planet analogy helps as well!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top