Why Are U-B and B-V Values Important in Studying Stars and Clusters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter randa177
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
U-B and B-V values are crucial for understanding a star's brightness across ultraviolet, blue, and visible light, with lower values indicating higher brightness. A low or negative U-B value suggests a star is bright in ultraviolet light, while a high B-V value indicates it appears reddish due to low blue output. There is a correlation between U-B and B-V values, where very red stars have large positive values for both, and very blue stars have small negative values. While these values generally follow a pattern, exceptions can occur, particularly in galaxies influenced by factors like dust and starbursts. Understanding these values is essential for classifying stars and analyzing their properties within clusters.
randa177
Messages
90
Reaction score
1
How can I get a sense of the numbers of (U-B) and (B-V)...
if a value of U-B for a star is larger than the other what does it mean? What about B-V... and what about the negative values...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
U, B, and V represent a star's brightness in the ultraviolet, blue, and visible ranges, respectively. Here, brightness is measured on a logarithmic scale where lower values mean higher light output. So if U-B is low or negative, that means the star is bright in the ultraviolet compared to blue. If B-V is high, that means the star is outputting very little light in blue, so the star is likely to look reddish.

For some typical values, try looking up some famous stars on Wikipedia and looking at the sidebar. Here are some nice examples:

Betelgeuse (very red)
Rigel (very blue)
Altair, Vega (somewhere in between)
 
ideasrule said:
U, B, and V represent a star's brightness in the ultraviolet, blue, and visible ranges, respectively. Here, brightness is measured on a logarithmic scale where lower values mean higher light output. So if U-B is low or negative, that means the star is bright in the ultraviolet compared to blue. If B-V is high, that means the star is outputting very little light in blue, so the star is likely to look reddish.

For some typical values, try looking up some famous stars on Wikipedia and looking at the sidebar. Here are some nice examples:

Betelgeuse (very red)
Rigel (very blue)
Altair, Vega (somewhere in between)

By looking at the values of the U-B and B-V that you suggested it seems that there is a corelation between U-B and B-V... for a really red star both values are large and positive, for a very blue star both values are small and negative, and for stars in between theu have smaal positive number... is this a general rule?
So If for example I want to order a set of colors from the most red to the most blue, do I compare the U-B or the B-V or balance them both?
 
These are 'colors' over some specified range. For stars, it mostly means that the value of any of these combinations is very high or low, it will be so for about every combination (within the convention that in X-Y A is a bluer band than Y).

This is not necessarily true though, and the colors of galaxies do reverse sometimes, due to dust, starbursts and so on. If you look at 'color color selection criteria' for galaxies you will find some plots where galaxies are 'high' (we call it blue) in some color, but 'low' (i.e. red) in another.
 
harcel said:
These are 'colors' over some specified range. For stars, it mostly means that the value of any of these combinations is very high or low, it will be so for about every combination (within the convention that in X-Y A is a bluer band than Y).

This is not necessarily true though, and the colors of galaxies do reverse sometimes, due to dust, starbursts and so on. If you look at 'color color selection criteria' for galaxies you will find some plots where galaxies are 'high' (we call it blue) in some color, but 'low' (i.e. red) in another.

I am not sure I understand what you mean, so if these values of U-B and B-V are not fixed then why are they so important in the study of stars and clusters... etc?
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top