A Simple ##d= vt## question, but I am confused

  • Thread starter Thread starter billllib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of time using the formula d = vt, specifically addressing how long it takes to travel 40,075 km at a speed of 300,000 km/s. The initial confusion arises from misinterpreting the question, leading to a miscalculation of the expected answer. Clarifications are made regarding unit conversions, emphasizing the importance of maintaining correct units in calculations. A participant also shares a resource on unit management in physics. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the significance of careful reading and unit consistency in solving physics problems.
billllib
Messages
76
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Answer the following questions involving the speed of light. (Assume that the speed of light is 300,000,000 meters/second. Also ignore any relativistic effects on time and length, because we have not covered those yet. In other words, the calculations below are intended to be straightforward time and distance calculations.)

(a) The circumference of the Earth at the equator is 40,075 km. If you could travel at the speed of light, how many times could you go around the Earth in one second?
Relevant Equations
##d = vt##
I think the answer should be## c = (300,000,000 ~meters/second) ##

## 300,000 km = \frac {300,000,000 ~ \rm{m/s}} {1000 ~\rm{km}}##

## d = vt ##

## d = 40,075 km ##

##t = \frac d v#### 40075 km / 300 000 km/s =0.1336 s ##

Why is the answer 7.5?
An help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can go 300,000 km in one second, how many times can you go 40,075 km in a second?

If a wall is seven meters long and your scale is two meters long, how many of them can you lay along the wall?
 
Got it just misread the question thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
billllib said:
## 300,000 km = \frac {300,000,000 ~ \rm{m/s}} {1000 ~\rm{km}}##
One thing I noticed with your formula, above: To keep the units and dimensions correct, it should actually be this:

## 300,000 ~ \rm{km/s} = \frac {300,000,000 ~ \rm{m/s}} {1000 ~\rm{m/km}}##

I'll take this moment to plug my Insights article - https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/make-units-work/
I hope you enjoy it.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top