A Simple Problem that seems to elude me

  • Thread starter Thread starter TooManyHours
  • Start date Start date
TooManyHours
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My mind is blank for some reason as I can't seem to figure out how to set up this problem...

It takes Steve and Dale together 10 hours to paint a house.

Steve takes 30 hours by himself.

How long would it take Dale to paint the house my himself?

Thanks...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
TooManyHours said:
My mind is blank for some reason as I can't seem to figure out how to set up this problem...

It takes Steve and Dale together 10 hours to paint a house.

Steve takes 30 hours by himself.

How long would it take Dale to paint the house my himself?

Thanks...
Steve paints houses at a rate of (1 house)/(30 hours). Assuming Steve has a linear rate of painting, we have 3*(1/30) = 1/10, which means Steve paints 1/3 of a house in 10 hours. Can you continue ? :smile:
 
OK,

Steve paints 1 house in 30 hours or 1/3 house in 30/3 = 10 hours

That means that Dale has to paint the other 2/3 of the house in the 10 hour period.

Working backwards for Steve, to get from the 10 hours together to his single total, we multiply 10 by 3/1 = 30 hours.

So, for Dale, we have to multiply 10 * 3/2 to get 30/2 or 15 hours to paint the house by himself.

I think...
 
Yes,15hrs is the correct answer... :smile:

Daniel.
 
Thanks...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
908
Back
Top