A spherical body moving with an unknown center of mass

y.moghadamnia
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
We have a sphere that its center of mass is not located in its center. suppose it has a mass of m.

what we want to do here is to write its movement equations, using Newton's laws or lagranigian.by move ment we mean writing the equations if a) a force F acts on the body on a surface that is fri?ction-free b) part a, this time with friction. how will the body move? and how can we describe it better

I have solved lots of mechanics problems before, but for this one, I don't know where to start, and how to relate its center of mass to the whole body. should I involve moment of inertia in my equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can you help me with this? For the first part, a), you can use Newton's second law of motion to express the equations of motion for the sphere. This involves the force F acting on the body, and the mass m. In this case, the equations of motion would be: F = ma Where 'a' is the acceleration of the sphere. For the second part, b), you can use the same equations of motion, except that this time you need to add a frictional force to the equation. This frictional force would be equal to F_f = - μF_n Where 'μ' is the coefficient of friction, and 'F_n' is the normal force due to gravity acting on the body. In both cases, you do not need to involve the moment of inertia in your equations. However, if you are working with a rotating sphere, then it would be useful to consider the moment of inertia in your equations.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top