A spring-block system on a frictional plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter xboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane System
xboy
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Maybe I should have posted this question in 'elementary physics' but the question seemed rather difficult to me(although involving elementary concepts) so i am posting it at this forum.Here goes.

Homework Statement



A block of mass m is attached to a spring of spring constant k.the other end of the spring is attached to a wall.The mass rests on a surface with friction coefficient \mu.Now the mass is given a displacement x_{0} from its equilibrium position.Calculate x at any subsequent time.

Homework Equations



The forces acting on the block are(taking the equilibrium position as origin)
force due to the spring:
\\F_{spring} = -kxi\hat \\<br />

<br /> \\ F_{friction} = \mu mgi\hat \\ \mbox{ when the block is moving in the -i direction}<br />

<br /> F_{friction} = -\mu mgi\hat \\ \mbox{ when the block is moving in +i direction}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



The equations i obtain are
m\ddot x +kx = \mu mg\ \mbox{when moving towards -i} \\<br />
<br /> \\ \mbox{and} m\ddot x + kx = -\mu mg\ \mbox{when moving towards +i}<br />
Solving them i get,for the first half cycle:
<br /> \\x = (x_{0} - \frac{\mu mg}{k})\cos \frac{k}{m}t + \frac{\mu mg}{k}\\<br />
<br /> <br /> \mbox{At the end of the first half cycle,the position of the block is,then } x&#039;_{0} = -x_{o} + 2\frac{\mu mg}{k}<br />
<br /> \\ \mbox{Now,if i take t= 0 at} x= x&#039;_{0} \ \mbox{ ,i get,from solving the second differential equation}
<br /> \\x = -( x&#039;_{o}+ \frac{\mu mg}{k}) \cos \frac{k}{m}t - \frac{\mu mg}{k}<br />
<br /> \mbox{At the end of this half-cycle the position is }<br />
<br /> x_{0} - 4\frac{\mu mg}{k} <br />

So I'm getting the result that for each half cycle the distance traversed goes down by 2\frac{\mu mg}{k}.I get the same reult from work-energy theorem.
is my method correct?if yes,is there a more elegant way of doing it?is there at least an elegant way of writing the answer?In my answer I'm putting t=0 at the start of each half-cycle,so i can't boil it down to less than 2 equations.

P.S:this is te first time I'm using latex.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
this looks all right.must've edited it 20 times or so! how does one start a new line in latex here? \\ doesn't seem to work.
 
Last edited:
thanx mentz,but that doesn't help.
yep,this is different from your usual damped oscillator,which is why I'm finding it difficult(and interesting)!
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top