A standard form of Complex Frequency can only have two terms?

AI Thread Summary
A standard form of complex frequency typically consists of two terms, represented as v(t) = K1e^(s1t) + K2e^(s2t). The user expresses confusion about whether a different expression, v(t) = K1e^s1 + K1e^s2 - K2e^s3 - K2e^s4, is valid. Clarification is provided that it is indeed possible to have more than one pair of terms in certain contexts. However, the notation and specific meanings behind the terms used may lead to confusion. Understanding the underlying principles and notation is essential for accurate calculations in complex frequency expressions.
korbear
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Standard from book:

v(t)=K1e^(s1t)+K2e^(s2t)

Can I have this below instead?

v(t)=K1e^s1 + K1e^s2 - K2e^s3 - K2e^s4

I'm really confused, I sometimes get this when I do calculations.

Any ideas? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's correct to have more than one pair, figured out.
 
I would have tried to help, but I wasn't 100% sure on the notation you're using or what is the specific meaning behind your question.
 

Thread '3-terminal device external modeling'

Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
View full post »
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'

Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'

I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
View full post »

Similar threads

Complex Frequency S, S* and S1, S1*?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Engineering Proving the Form of a Homogenous LC Circuit?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Making a calculator program that can calculate integer addition / subtraction
Replies
1
Views
2K
Significance of standard form of 1st and 2nd order transfer functions?
Replies
3
Views
7K
Alternator torque when connected to a phase-shifted AC source
Replies
3
Views
2K
Partial fractions with complex linear terms
Replies
8
Views
990
What is the term for averaged values in segmented distances?
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Obtaining this form for molar energy under virial expansion (Callen)
Replies
23
Views
2K
I The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
Replies
26
Views
4K
Are atomic conductivity and standard reduction potential correlated?
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top