Physics A taste of Physics and Computer Science

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transition from studying Physics to Computer Science, prompted by a student's dissatisfaction with first-year Physics, which they found boring compared to the exciting depictions in popular science media. Participants emphasize that higher-level Physics is significantly more challenging and math-intensive than introductory courses, with many agreeing that the excitement in Physics often comes from advanced topics like quantum mechanics and relativity. There is a consensus that while Physics graduates may not predominantly work in academia, the definition of "physics-related" jobs can vary widely. The conversation also highlights that Computer Science involves substantial mathematics, particularly in areas like algorithms and data structures, and that the perception of CS being easier than Physics may be misleading. Ultimately, the thread suggests caution against making academic decisions based solely on popular science narratives, as they can oversimplify the complexities of both fields.
Yashbhatt
Messages
348
Reaction score
13
Hello.

This is a follow up question of this thread:
(https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/confused-between-physics-and-computer-science.884599/page-3)

I have always been interested in Physics since high school but I found first year undergraduate Physics very boring and I think I may have been misled by PopSci articles/videos about what actual Physics is like.

As a result, I am thinking about changing my major to Computer Science. So, can you guys tell me about some concepts or anything(in Physics or CS) that might help me figure out if I will be interested in it at a later stage or not?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, what do you think you know about what higher level physics is like? What are you suspecting PopSci has mislead you about?
 
TJGilb said:
Well, what do you think you know about what higher level physics is like? What are you suspecting PopSci has mislead you about?

I think it's definitely not as easy at it look and the exciting moments are much less as compared to shown in the media. Also, it involves a hell lot of math.
 
That I can confirm. Physics is probably the most math intensive discipline outside mathematics itself. And it is certainly very hard. But I'd say it is worth it. Whether or not it is exciting is really up to what interests you. Personally I find learning about how the universe works to be exciting. Though it wouldn't be right to judge off of first year physics before you've even touched quantum, relativity, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism.
 
TJGilb said:
That I can confirm. Physics is probably the most math intensive discipline outside mathematics itself. And it is certainly very hard. But I'd say it is worth it. Whether or not it is exciting is really up to what interests you. Personally I find learning about how the universe works to be exciting. Though it wouldn't be right to judge off of first year physics before you've even touched quantum, relativity, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism.

Also, I have read that there are very few physics related jobs and most physicists migrate to other fields. Is that true?
 
Depends on how broadly you define "physics related".
 
TJGilb said:
Depends on how broadly you define "physics related".
Academia?
 
Yashbhatt said:
Academia?
What do think you won't get Maths in CS ?
CS is less programming and more Maths.
You can't run from Maths.
 
Buffu said:
What do think you won't get Maths in CS ?
CS is less programming and more Maths.
You can't run from Maths.

I know that. I don't hate math. I quite like it. But the amount of math in CS is a lot less than Physics.
 
  • #10
Yashbhatt said:
Academia?

I can't remember the site, but there are statistics on where Physics grads go after earning their degree. I believe it also depends on whether you go for a PhD or not. But yes, most don't end up in academia, I think somewhere around 20% do.
 
  • #11
Can we use this thread as the poster child on why one should never make any serious decision or conclusion based on what one reads in pop-science books?

Zz.
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
Can we use this thread as the poster child on why one should never make any serious decision or conclusion based on what one reads in pop-science books?

Zz.

I love how it gets people interested in science, but it definitely misleads people into thinking they know more than they do.
 
  • #13
ZapperZ said:
Can we use this thread as the poster child on why one should never make any serious decision or conclusion based on what one reads in pop-science books?

Zz.

To be clear, I actually did read actual books with equations(University Physics, HR etc.) but realized that that much is just the beginning and the road ahead is really long.
 
  • #14
Yashbhatt said:
To be clear, I actually did read actual books with equations(University Physics, HR etc.) but realized that that much is just the beginning and the road ahead is really long.

I think you got a wrong idea about CS. If you think Physics is too difficult then the same goes for CS, learning algorithms and data structures is not easy as you think.
Maths in CS is less interesting as compared to Physics.
 
  • #15
Buffu said:
I think you got a wrong idea about CS. If you think Physics is too difficult then the same goes for CS, learning algorithms and data structures is not easy as you think.
Maths in CS is less interesting as compared to Physics.

Okay. As per what I read online, interesting things in Physics are only done at the post-doc level while in CS a Bachelors or Masters is enough.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top