Schools A third year physics university student

AI Thread Summary
Many third-year physics students express disappointment in their learning experience, feeling they haven't grasped concepts deeply despite being in advanced courses. The fast-paced curriculum often prioritizes operational knowledge over a thorough understanding of proofs and derivations. Engaging in research is recommended as it significantly enhances learning compared to traditional classes. Students are encouraged to dedicate extra time to review and understand the material independently. Graduate programs are noted for their rigorous focus on conceptual understanding, which may better align with students' desires for in-depth learning.
thegirl
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
Hi
I don't really know how I got to third year but I'm here and I'm a bit disappointed in the fact that I've learned stuff but at the same time feel like I haven't really learned much.

I would love going through books and reading in depth about what my lecturers are teaching me, like I like looking at proofs and seeing all the nitty gritty things but I've found at university there isn't really much time for that.

Anyone else at university feel the same way? Any people who do learn things from books and go lectures and study and complete your problem classes...how do you do it?

Any general advice on how to do well would be really appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's funny, I'm in my last semester (4th year) and feel the same way. I've spent the last 4 years learning things but still feel like I just walked out of high school.

One thing I recommend is doing research. The rate at which you learn new things in classes is nothing comparable to the rate at which you learn new things doing research.
 
Yes, in the past I've felt as if there's so much course material to cover in some classes I've taken that more "abstract" learning objectives like knowledge of full derivations and proofs are brushed aside for a more operational knowledge of the subject (at least, this is my experience in undergrad engineering). I found myself having to put aside a lot of extra time during both my semesters and vacations reviewing and re-performing derivations myself until I understood the inner workings of the concepts and equations we were using. I feel as if this prejudice towards operational knowledge over conceptual understanding comes with the territory of having a lot of ground to cover in a relatively short period of time, as is the case with many STEM majors.

However, a graduate program will likely provide the rigor that you seek. In many graduate classes, there is a heavier emphasis on proofs and derivations, and often times, an expectation that by the end of the course you have a full understanding of them. Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top