A twist on Maxwell's equations boundary conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the boundary conditions of magnetic fields as described by Maxwell's equations. It highlights that the difference between the tangential magnetic fields (Ht1 and Ht2) across a boundary is equal to the surface current density (Js). In cases where there is no surface current (Js = 0), the boundary condition simplifies to showing that the tangential magnetic fields are equal on both sides of the boundary. The conversation also touches on the implications of having a perfect electric conductor (PEC) at the boundary, where the tangential magnetic field must equal the surface current density. Overall, the participants clarify the conditions under which these magnetic field relationships hold true.
Ahmad Kishki
Messages
158
Reaction score
13
we have that Ht1 (x,y,z) - Ht2 (x,y,z) = Js and for the special case Ht1 (x,y,z) - Ht2 (x,y,z) = 0 where there is no surface current. At a boundary with Js =0, which for simplicity let's asume is at at x = a, then knowing that Ht1 and Ht2 are the magnetic fields to the left and right of the boundary respectively, we can then re write the boundary condition as lim e->0 Ht1 (a-e,y,z) - Ht2 (a+e,y,z) = 0 from which. Ht'(a,y,z) = 0 would follow if Ht1 (x,y,z) = Ht2 (x,y,z)?
 
Ahmad, I'm not sure that I follow you. Are you asking whether the partial derivative of the tangential H field with respect to x is equal to zero? If so, I see no reason that it needs to be.

What is the greater context of your question? You are talking about boundary conditions of magnetic fields. In general, the difference between the tangential magnetic fields on either side of the boundary is equal to the current density on the boundary - as you have already pointed out. When there are no sources or charges, the difference between the tangential magnetic fields on either side of the boundary is equal to zero. If the material on one side of the boundary is a perfect electric conductor (PEC), then the tangential magnetic field at the boundary is equal to the surface current density on the conductor (noting that no field can exist inside of a PEC).
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top