A very theoretical approach to diff eq

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced in a differential equations course using the Boyce DiPrima textbook, particularly regarding the proofs of theorems like Heine-Borel and Bolzano-Weierstrauss. The user expresses difficulty understanding these concepts due to a lack of detail in the textbook and a weak calculus background. Suggestions are made to explore introductory real analysis texts, as the theorems in question are categorized under real analysis rather than differential equations. It is clarified that while differential equations and real analysis are related, they focus on different aspects; real analysis is more rigorous calculus, whereas differential equations emphasize applications and theorems related to existence and uniqueness. Recommended resources include "The Elements of Real Analysis" by Bartle, "Mathematical Analysis" by Apostol, and V I Arnold's book on differential equations for a more theoretical perspective.
stgermaine
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm taking diff eq course this semester and the text is the latest Boyce DiPrima diff eq with boundary value problems.

The first test is mostly proofs on theorems about continuity, like the Heine-Borel theorem, Bolzano-Weierstrauss theorem, etc. The book doesn't go into much details about those theorems and I have problem understanding from just researching online.

Is there a book that takes a more theoretical approach to diff eq without being too dense? I don't have a very strong base in calc, as it's been three years since taking calc III and haven't found the time to review during the summer.

Edit: I found that the Heine and Bolzano theorems are filed under 'real analysis theorems' so I think getting a intro real analysis book may help. Am I correct in understanding that diff eq is similar to real analysis but with more emphasis on application?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diff eq and real analysis are two quite different courses. Real analysis is basically just calculus, but more rigorous. It won't deal much with differential equations typically. It might cover things like Heine-Borel and other stuff.

On the other hand, we have differential equations. A theoretical course in diff eq will likely consist out of proving various existence and uniqueness theorems. Real analysis is used as a tool to prove these things.

The theorems you mention are indeed real analysis, and not so much diff eq. A book which might be helpful is "The Elements of Real Analysis" by Bartle or "Mathematical Analysis" by Apostol.
 
It's very strange that Boyce and DiPrima (:gag:) would be the text.

You can try V I Arnold's book on differential equations, along with an analysis book.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top