About bases of complex (Hilbert) space

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi there,
In 3-dimensional real linear space, the simplest bases can be taken as the canonical bases

\hat{x} = \left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right), \qquad \hat{y} = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 1 \\0\end{matrix}\right), \qquad \hat{z} = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)

I wonder what's the simplest counterpart for 3-dimensional in complex (hilbert) space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the basis you gave for R^3 is also a basis for C^3
 
Thanks. But can we construct a basis similar to those for R^3 but with the entries be complex? and how?
 
The exact same basis will do. Remember that your scalars are complex numbers.
 
KFC said:
Thanks. But can we construct a basis similar to those for R^3 but with the entries be complex? and how?

sure, if you replace your 1's with i's it's still a basis. all you have to do is pick 3 vectors so that no one of them is a linear combination of the other 2. if you want it to be an orthonormal basis (which is usually useful) then you need to also make sure that each vector is of unit length and orthogonal to the other 2.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top