About lighting strikes and sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter bottecchia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lighting Sources
AI Thread Summary
Lightning strike simulations utilize current sources instead of voltage sources because, once the breakdown voltage of air is exceeded, the current measured approaches the short circuit current, regardless of path resistance. The impedance of the object in the current's path influences the voltage generated across it, as the voltage must rise to maintain a constant current. This behavior aligns with the characteristics of a high impedance source, making current sources more representative of lightning strikes. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between current, voltage, and resistance in these simulations. Overall, simulating lightning strikes as current sources provides a more accurate representation of the phenomena involved.
bottecchia
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone.

I would like to know why we simulate in programs like atp lighting strikes with current sources and not with voltage sources.

Could anyone help?

Thank you :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No idea about lightning strike simulations, but from the electrics side:
If you put a small resistor (whatever gets hit by lightning) in series with a large resistor (all the air) and attach it to a voltage source (cloud-ground), the current through the resistors doesn't depend significantly on the resistance value, but voltage does.
 
so why we cannot simulate the lightning strike with a voltage source?

we will have a small resistance and a high voltage so we will produce a high current between the cloud and the ground.

does anyone know what is wrong in my thoughts?
 
bottecchia said:
so why we cannot simulate the lightning strike with a voltage source?

we will have a small resistance and a high voltage so we will produce a high current between the cloud and the ground.

does anyone know what is wrong in my thoughts?

It's represented by the equivalent of a current source because once we exceed the breakdown voltage of air to the grounding point the measured current is almost equal to the short circuit current for a wide range of path resistances (a high impedance source). The impedance of the object in the path of current flow determines the amount of voltage generated across that object as the voltage will rise to the level needed to maintain constant current.
 
nsaspook said:
It's represented by the equivalent of a current source because once we exceed the breakdown voltage of air to the grounding point the measured current is almost equal to the short circuit current for a wide range of path resistances (a high impedance source). The impedance of the object in the path of current flow determines the amount of voltage generated across that object as the voltage will rise to the level needed to maintain constant current.

wow... thank you man you are my hero... :)
 
Could you be more specific?

nsaspook said:
It's represented by the equivalent of a current source because once we exceed the breakdown voltage of air to the grounding point the measured current is almost equal to the short circuit current for a wide range of path resistances (a high impedance source). The impedance of the object in the path of current flow determines the amount of voltage generated across that object as the voltage will rise to the level needed to maintain constant current.
 
mitre said:
Could you be more specific?

This mighty help.
http://www.dehn-usa.com/manager/file.asp?tableName=tblPublications&idField=publicationId&namePrefix=smImg&idValue=38
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
thanks nsaspook

nice informative link

Dave
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top