About the curl of B using Biot-Savart Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the transition between equations (5.52) and (5.53) in Griffiths' work regarding the curl of B using the Biot-Savart Law. The key point is the application of the product rule to deduce the expression for the x components of the vector field. Specifically, it involves manipulating the term (\boldsymbol{J}\cdot\nabla^{\prime})\dfrac{x-x^{\prime}}{\xi^{3}} to derive the relationship with divergence and the current density vector J. Participants clarify that using the product rule allows for the separation of terms, leading to the desired result. This highlights the importance of mastering vector calculus techniques in electromagnetic theory.
yanyan_leung
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am reading the Griffiths about finding the curl of B using Biot-Savart Law. I do not understanding the step between equation (5.52) and (5.53) which finding the x components of the following:
(\boldsymbol{J}\cdot\nabla^{\prime})\dfrac{\hat{\xi}}{\xi^{2}}
where
\mathbf{\mathbf{\xi}}=\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}^{\prime}
I don't know why it said using product rule 5 in his book, can get the following result:
\left(\boldsymbol{J}\cdot\nabla^{\prime}\right)\dfrac{x-x^{\prime}}{\xi^{3}}=\nabla^{\prime}\cdot\left[\dfrac{(x-x^{\prime})}{\xi^{3}}\mathbf{J}\right]-\left(\dfrac{x-x^{\prime}}{\xi^{3}}\right)\left(\nabla^{\prime}\cdot\mathbf{J}\right)
Is there anyone know how to deduce this result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi yanyan_leung ! Welcome to PF! :smile:
yanyan_leung said:
\left(\boldsymbol{J}\cdot\nabla^{\prime}\right)\dfrac{x-x^{\prime}}{\xi^{3}}=\nabla^{\prime}\cdot\left[\dfrac{(x-x^{\prime})}{\xi^{3}}\mathbf{J}\right]-\left(\dfrac{x-x^{\prime}}{\xi^{3}}\right)\left(\nabla^{\prime}\cdot\mathbf{J}\right)
Is there anyone know how to deduce this result?

That's ∑i (Ji∂/∂xi) (f) = ∑i ∂/∂xi (fJi) - f ∑i ∂/∂xi (Ji) …

now just use the product rule on the middle term. :wink:
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top