About the reactance of capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter lindacheung66
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Reactance
AI Thread Summary
Capacitors resist current flow through the development of a potential difference (PD) across their terminals, which opposes the supply voltage once fully charged. This phenomenon is described as capacitive reactance, where the capacitor blocks direct current (DC) but allows alternating current (AC) to pass at varying frequencies. The higher the frequency of the AC, the lower the opposing PD becomes, resulting in decreased reactance. The discussion also highlights the importance of considering series electrical resistance in practical applications, as it affects the charging behavior of capacitors. Understanding these concepts clarifies how capacitors function in electrical circuits.
lindacheung66
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
For inductors, it is the induced e.m.f. which resists the current flow.
However, I don't quite understand how capacitors resist the current flow.
Why is there capacitive reactance?
What does 'A built-up electric field resists the change of voltage on the element' mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lindacheung66 said:
For inductors, it is the induced e.m.f. which resists the current flow.
However, I don't quite understand how capacitors resist the current flow.
Why is there capacitive reactance?
What does 'A built-up electric field resists the change of voltage on the element' mean?

That last quote doesn't really make strict sense. Using the word "resists", in this context, implies resistance (a mechanism for losing energy as current is conducted).
A capacitor, being basically an open circuit, will not carry on conducting forever, when connected to a battery. Initially, however, some charge can flow into it. As the charge increases, an increasing potential difference will form across the terminals and, once this PD is equal to the supply voltage, no more current will flow (there is an exponential change). The PD across the capacitor 'opposes' the supply voltage, rather than "resisting" it. (Here, I am talking in terms of the usage of those words in the context of electrical circuits and not in general English language use).
That's why we say that a capacitor 'blocks' DC. For an alternating current , particularly at a high enough frequency, the direction of the applied AC voltage changes rapidly enough for the capacitor never to get fully charged and so the capacitor 'lets through' an alternating current. The higher the frequency, the less the opposing PD becomes so the Reactance decreases proportionally.
 
Thank you very much.
You have difinitely dispersed my misunderstanding.
 
Good good. Keep 'em coming. :smile:

btw, I should have included, in my hand waving model of charging a capacitor, some amount of Series Electrical Resistance in the source of the Voltage. There will always be finite resistance, in practice, so it is a reasonable thing to do. Without the added resistance, you get other awkward things happening and more headaches!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top