Absolute convergence, boundedness, and multiplication

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


If the series \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_n converges absolutely, and the sequence (y_n)_n is bounded, then the series \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_ny_n converges.

Homework Equations


Definitions and theorems relating to series and convergence.

The Attempt at a Solution


If the sequence y_n is bounded, then |y_n|\leq M for all n. Then \sum_{k=1}^{n}x_ky_k\leq\sum_{k=1}^{n}Mx_k. But M\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_n is convergent which implies that \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_ny_n is also by comparison. \blacksquare

Now I believe this is the right path, however, I did not use the absolute convergence in this proof, and I didn't really consider if the terms in y_n were negative... I need some help to know how to include these aspects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_ky_k\leq\sum_{k=1}^{n}Mx_k

This isn't necessarily true. If both x and y alternate, say yn = -1n and xn = -1n / n, then it doesn't converge, even though y is bounded and the x-series converges. That is the step in which you need to integrate absolute convergence.
 
Sethric said:
\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_ky_k\leq\sum_{k=1}^{n}Mx_k

This isn't necessarily true. If both x and y alternate, say yn = -1n and xn = -1n / n, then it doesn't converge, even though y is bounded and the x-series converges. That is the step in which you need to integrate absolute convergence.

I agree I need to integrate in absolute convergence, however x_n=(-1)^n/n could not be since it is absolutely convergent, and the alternating harmonic series is not. But I get what you are getting at in that I must find a way to include the absolute convergence for particularly sticky situations.
 
\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n} is not absolutely convergent.

and the alternating harmonic series is not
That technically is an alternating harmonic series.

What I am driving at is using absolute values. Can you think of a way to do that step using absolute values that takes advantage of the absolute convergence of xn?
 
Sethric said:
\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n} is not absolutely convergent.


That technically is an alternating harmonic series.

What I am driving at is using absolute values. Can you think of a way to do that step using absolute values that takes advantage of the absolute convergence of xn?

Ah! I was trying to say that it is not absolutely convergent, so x_n could not be what you had in your example. But you posted before I could edit it

I'll try and think a bit more about it but that has been what I have been trying to think of...
 
Let me try this:

You know the sequence yn is bounded. What do you know about:

\sum_{k=1}^\infty \left| x_k y_k \right|

?
 
Sethric said:
Let me try this:

You know the sequence yn is bounded. What do you know about:

\sum_{k=1}^\infty \left| x_k y_k \right|

?

Okay, I think I got it:

Given \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_n converges absolutely, and y_n is bounded, then |y_n|\leq M for all n for some M>0. Consider

M\sum_{k=1}^{n}|x_k|\geq\sum_{k=1}^{n}|x_k||y_k|=\sum_{k=1}^{n}|x_ky_k|.

But M\sum_{k=1}^{n}|x_k| is convergent which implies that \sum_{k=1}^{n}|x_ky_k| is also convergent. But if the sequence of partial sums converge, so does the series. Then since the series is absolutely convergent, it is convergent. \blacksquare
 

Similar threads

Back
Top