Is the explanation wrong as well? That our physics models break down at that point?Vanadium 50 said:Sadly, the notion of "absolute hot" is utter and complete nonsense. The Planck temperature is no more the highest temperature than the Planck resistance (30 ohms) is the highest (or would it be lowest?) resistance.
Absolute hot refers to the theoretical highest possible temperature that can exist in the universe, also known as the Planck temperature. It is approximately 1.416 x 10^32 Kelvin or 1.416 x 10^32 degrees Celsius.
Absolute zero is the theoretical lowest possible temperature that can exist, at which all molecular motion stops. In contrast, absolute hot is the theoretical highest possible temperature, at which all molecular motion is at its maximum.
No, it is impossible for absolute hot to be reached in our universe due to the laws of physics. As temperatures increase, energy dissipates and prevents further heating. Additionally, matter would not be able to exist at such high temperatures.
Since absolute hot cannot be reached in our universe, there are no known examples of it in nature. However, some theories suggest that the Big Bang, the event that created the universe, may have briefly reached absolute hot temperatures.
Studying absolute hot helps us to better understand the fundamental laws of physics and the limits of our universe. It also has potential applications in fields such as astrophysics and quantum mechanics.