Absolute Zero Gas: Is Motion Possible?

AI Thread Summary
At absolute zero, gas particles do not completely stop moving; instead, they exhibit behavior consistent with Bose-Einstein Condensates. As the temperature approaches absolute zero, the particles' movement decreases, but due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP), their positions become less defined, leading to a "smearing out" effect. This means that while their kinetic energy is minimized, they retain a quantum state that prevents them from being completely at rest. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding quantum mechanics in relation to temperature and particle behavior. Overall, gas particles at absolute zero still possess motion, albeit in a unique quantum state.
heavystray
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
What happen to gas particles at absolute zero?
Is it possible that the particles will still be moving ?
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Read up on Bose-Einstein Condensates.

Is this a homework question?
 
DaveC426913 said:
Read up on Bose-Einstein Condensates.

Is this a homework question?

The homework question is acctually a bit different. It says what is the characteristics of gas particles at absolute zero.
I read some articles that say the gas particles will stop moving
 
heavystray said:
I read some articles that say the gas particles will stop moving
No. If they stopped moving they would violate HUP. What happens is that the atoms "smear out" into what's called Bose-Einstein Condensate.
Basically, the more their movement becomes known (i.e. approaches zero) the more their position becomes unknown (they smear out).
 
DaveC426913 said:
No. If they stopped moving they would violate HUP. What happens is that the atoms "smear out" into what's called Bose-Einstein Condensate.
Basically, the more their movement becomes known (i.e. approaches zero) the more their position becomes unknown (they smear out).

thank you, really appreciate it
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top